Literature DB >> 11064985

Comparison between the kinematics of fixed and rotating bearing knee prostheses.

D D D'Lima1, M Trice, A G Urquhart, C W Colwell.   

Abstract

Rotating platform mobile bearing knee implants allow for increased tibiofemoral articular conformity without restricting axial rotation. In the current study, the effect of rotating platform knee replacement with and without posterior cruciate ligament substitution on knee kinematics was investigated. Five knees were implanted sequentially implanted with standard (fixed) bearings and then with rotating platform prostheses, each in posterior cruciate retaining and substituting designs. Three-dimensional kinematics for all knees were measured in an Oxford Knee Rig, which simulates dynamic quadriceps-driven closed kinetic chain knee extension under load. Rotating bearings did not significantly change knee kinematics when compared with fixed bearings. In this in vitro model, the cruciate retaining designs stayed more anterior, and had greater net femoral roll back and tibiofemoral valgus angulation with flexion than cruciate substituting designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11064985     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200011000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of the tibiofemoral rotational alignment after mobile and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dongwook Kim; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee; Sahnghoon Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Femoro-tibial kinematics after TKA in fixed- and mobile-bearing knees in the sagittal plane.

Authors:  Kiriakos Daniilidis; Steffen Höll; Georg Gosheger; Ralf Dieckmann; Nicolo Martinelli; Sven Ostermeier; Carsten O Tibesku
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Mobile versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: mid-term comparative clinical results of 216 prostheses.

Authors:  D Biau; M M Mullins; T Judet; P Piriou
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Comparison among total knee arthroplasties with a mobile bearing: menisci versus rotating platform versus AP glide platform.

Authors:  Giuseppe Solarino; Andrea Luca; Luigi Marzo; Lorenzo Scialpi; Giovanni B Solarino
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2008-06-27

5.  Lack of axial rotation in mobile-bearing knee designs.

Authors:  Ray C Wasielewski; Richard D Komistek; Sumesh M Zingde; Kate C Sheridan; Mohamed R Mahfouz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Posterior-stabilized inserts are preferable to cruciate-substituting ultracongruent inserts due to more favourable kinematics and stability.

Authors:  Ji-Hoon Bae; Jung-Ro Yoon; Ju-Hyoung Sung; Young-Soo Shin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in terms of patellofemoral pain and function: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  P Z Feczko; L M Jutten; M J van Steyn; P Deckers; P J Emans; J J Arts
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator.

Authors:  Markus Wünschel; Ulf Leichtle; Jiahsuan Lo; Nikolaus Wülker; Otto Müller
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2012-01-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.