Literature DB >> 11064784

A randomized controlled trial of a hospital at home service for the terminally ill.

G E Grande1, C J Todd, S I Barclay, M C Farquhar.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of a Cambridge hospital at home service (CHAH) on patients' quality of care, likelihood of remaining at home in their final 2 weeks of life and general practitioner (GP) visits. The design was a randomized controlled trial, comparing CHAH with standard care. The patient's district nurse, GP and informal carer were surveyed within 6 weeks of patient's death, and 225 district nurses, 194 GPs and 144 informal carers of 229 patients responded. There was no clear evidence that CHAH increased likelihood of remaining at home during the final 2 weeks of life. However, the service was associated with fewer GP out of hours visits. All respondent groups rated CHAH favourably compared to standard care but emphasized different aspects. District nurses rated CHAH as better than standard care in terms of adequacy of night care and support for the carer, GPs in terms of anxiety and depression, and informal carers in terms of control of pain and nausea. Thus whilst CHAH was not found to increase the likelihood of remaining at home, at appeared to be associated with better quality home care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11064784     DOI: 10.1191/026921600701536200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  18 in total

1.  Factors Associated with End-of-Life Health Service Use in Patients Dying of Cancer.

Authors:  Lisa Barbera; Jonathan Sussman; Raymond Viola; Amna Husain; Doris Howell; S Lawrence Librach; Hugh Walker; Rinku Sutradhar; Carole Chartier; Lawrence Paszat
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-02

2.  The challenge of selection bias and confounding in palliative care research.

Authors:  Helene Starks; Paula Diehr; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 3.  Association Between Palliative Care and Patient and Caregiver Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dio Kavalieratos; Jennifer Corbelli; Di Zhang; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Natalie C Ernecoff; Janel Hanmer; Zachariah P Hoydich; Dara Z Ikejiani; Michele Klein-Fedyshin; Camilla Zimmermann; Sally C Morton; Robert M Arnold; Lucas Heller; Yael Schenker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Non-invasive interventions for improving well-being and quality of life in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  José-Ramón Rueda; Ivan Solà; Antonio Pascual; Mireia Subirana Casacuberta
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-09-07

5.  A systematic review of psychosocial interventions for family carers of palliative care patients.

Authors:  Peter L Hudson; Cheryl Remedios; Kristina Thomas
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 6.  Hospital at home: home-based end-of-life care.

Authors:  Sasha Shepperd; Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley; Sharon E Straus; Bee Wee
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-18

Review 7.  Hospital at home: home-based end of life care.

Authors:  Sasha Shepperd; Bee Wee; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-07-06

8.  Where do patients with cancer die in Belfast?

Authors:  D Davison; G Johnston; P Reilly; M Stevenson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 9.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers.

Authors:  Barbara Gomes; Natalia Calanzani; Vito Curiale; Paul McCrone; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-06

10.  Hospital at home: home-based end-of-life care.

Authors:  Sasha Shepperd; Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley; Sharon E Straus; Bee Wee
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.