Literature DB >> 11064143

Detection of artifacts in monitored trends in intensive care.

S Jakob1, I Korhonen, E Ruokonen, T Virtanen, A Kogan, J Takala.   

Abstract

In intensive care, decision-making is often based on trend analysis of physiological parameters. Artifact detection is a pre-requisite for interpretation of trends both for clinical and research purposes. In this study, we developed and tested three methods of artifact detection in physiological data (systolic, mean and diastolic artery and pulmonary artery pressures, central venous pressure, and peripheral temperature) using pre-filtered physiological signals (2-min median filtering) from 41 patients after cardiac surgery. These methods were: (1) the Rosner statistic; (2) slope detection with rules; and (3) comparison with a running median (median detection). After tuning the methods using data from 20 randomly chosen patients, the methods were tested using the data from the remaining patients. The results were compared with those obtained by manual identification of artifacts by three senior intensive care unit physicians. Out of an average of 22,480 data points for each variable, the three observers labelled 0.98% (220 data points) as artifacts. The inter-observer agreement was good. The average (range) sensitivity for artifact detection in all variables in the test database was 66% (33-92%) for the Rosner statistic, 64% (24-98%) for slope detection and 72% (41-98%) for median detection. All methods had a high specificity (> or = 94%). Slope detection had the highest mean positive prediction rate (53%; 21-85%). When the performance was measured by the cost function, slope detection and running median performed equally well and were superior to Rosner statistics for systemic arterial and central venous pressure and peripheral temperature. None of the methods produced acceptable results for pulmonary artery pressures. We conclude that median filtering of physiological variables is effective in removing artifacts. In post-operative cardiac surgery patients, the remaining artifacts are difficult to detect among physiological and pathophysiological changes. This makes large databases for tuning artifact algorithms mandatory. Despite these limitations, the performance of running median and slope detection were good in selected physiological variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11064143     DOI: 10.1016/s0169-2607(00)00110-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed        ISSN: 0169-2607            Impact factor:   5.428


  9 in total

1.  Individual and joint expert judgments as reference standards in artifact detection.

Authors:  Marion Verduijn; Niels Peek; Nicolette F de Keizer; Erik-Jan van Lieshout; Anne-Cornelie J M de Pont; Marcus J Schultz; Evert de Jonge; Bas A J M de Mol
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  A robust approach toward recognizing valid arterial-blood-pressure pulses.

Authors:  Shadnaz Asgari; Marvin Bergsneider; Xiao Hu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2009-10-30

3.  An evaluation of three measures of intracranial compliance in traumatic brain injury patients.

Authors:  Tim Howells; Anders Lewén; Mattias K Sköld; Elisabeth Ronne-Engström; Per Enblad
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Arterial blood pressure during early sepsis and outcome.

Authors:  Martin W Dünser; Jukka Takala; Hanno Ulmer; Viktoria D Mayr; Günter Luckner; Stefan Jochberger; Fritz Daudel; Philipp Lepper; Walter R Hasibeder; Stephan M Jakob
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Robust heart rate estimation from multiple asynchronous noisy sources using signal quality indices and a Kalman filter.

Authors:  Q Li; R G Mark; G D Clifford
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 2.833

6.  Machine Learning and Decision Support in Critical Care.

Authors:  Alistair E W Johnson; Mohammad M Ghassemi; Shamim Nemati; Katherine E Niehaus; David A Clifton; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 10.961

7.  Hemodynamic variables and mortality in cardiogenic shock: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Christian Torgersen; Christian A Schmittinger; Sarah Wagner; Hanno Ulmer; Jukka Takala; Stephan M Jakob; Martin W Dünser
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Using hemoglobin A1C as a predicting model for time interval from pre-diabetes progressing to diabetes.

Authors:  Chen-Ling Huang; Usman Iqbal; Phung-Anh Nguyen; Zih-Fang Chen; Daniel L Clinciu; Yi-Hsin Elsa Hsu; Chung-Huei Hsu; Wen-Shan Jian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Patch validation: an observational study protocol for the evaluation of a multisignal wearable sensor in patients during anaesthesia and in the postanaesthesia care unit.

Authors:  Morgan Le Guen; Pierre Squara; Sabrina Ma; Shérifa Adjavon; Bernard Trillat; Messaouda Merzoug; Philippe Aegerter; Marc Fischler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.