R L Weinsier1, T R Nagy, G R Hunter, B E Darnell, D D Hensrud, H L Weiss. 1. Departments of Nutrition Sciences and Human Studies, the General Clinical Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, and the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. weinsier@shrp.uab.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obese persons generally regain lost weight, suggesting that adaptive metabolic changes favor return to a preset weight. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine whether adaptive changes in resting metabolic rate (RMR) and thyroid hormones occur in weight-reduced persons, predisposing them to long-term weight gain. DESIGN: Twenty-four overweight, postmenopausal women were studied at a clinical research center in four 10-d study phases: the overweight state (phase 1, energy balance; phase 2, 3350 kJ/d) and after reduction to a normal-weight state (phase 3, 3350 kJ/d; phase 4, energy balance). Weight-reduced women were matched with 24 never-overweight control subjects. After each study phase, assessments included RMR (by indirect calorimetry), body composition (by hydrostatic weighing), serum triiodothyronine (T(3)), and reverse T(3) (rT(3)). Body weight was measured 4 y later, without intervention. RESULTS: Body composition-adjusted RMR and T(3):rT(3) fell during acute (phase 2) and chronic (phase 3) energy restriction (P: < 0.01), but returned to baseline in the normal-weight, energy-balanced state (phase 4; mean weight loss: 12.9 +/- 2.0 kg). RMR among weight-reduced women (4771 +/- 414 kJ/d) was not significantly different from that in control subjects (4955 +/- 414 kJ/d; P: = 0.14), and lower RMR did not predict greater 4-y weight regain (r = 0.27, NS). CONCLUSIONS: Energy restriction produces a transient hypothyroid-hypometabolic state that normalizes on return to energy-balanced conditions. Failure to establish energy balance after weight loss gives the misleading impression that weight-reduced persons are energy conservative and predisposed to weight regain. Our findings do not provide evidence in support of adaptive metabolic changes as an explanation for the tendency of weight-reduced persons to regain weight.
BACKGROUND: Obese persons generally regain lost weight, suggesting that adaptive metabolic changes favor return to a preset weight. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine whether adaptive changes in resting metabolic rate (RMR) and thyroid hormones occur in weight-reduced persons, predisposing them to long-term weight gain. DESIGN: Twenty-four overweight, postmenopausal women were studied at a clinical research center in four 10-d study phases: the overweight state (phase 1, energy balance; phase 2, 3350 kJ/d) and after reduction to a normal-weight state (phase 3, 3350 kJ/d; phase 4, energy balance). Weight-reduced women were matched with 24 never-overweight control subjects. After each study phase, assessments included RMR (by indirect calorimetry), body composition (by hydrostatic weighing), serum triiodothyronine (T(3)), and reverse T(3) (rT(3)). Body weight was measured 4 y later, without intervention. RESULTS: Body composition-adjusted RMR and T(3):rT(3) fell during acute (phase 2) and chronic (phase 3) energy restriction (P: < 0.01), but returned to baseline in the normal-weight, energy-balanced state (phase 4; mean weight loss: 12.9 +/- 2.0 kg). RMR among weight-reduced women (4771 +/- 414 kJ/d) was not significantly different from that in control subjects (4955 +/- 414 kJ/d; P: = 0.14), and lower RMR did not predict greater 4-y weight regain (r = 0.27, NS). CONCLUSIONS: Energy restriction produces a transient hypothyroid-hypometabolic state that normalizes on return to energy-balanced conditions. Failure to establish energy balance after weight loss gives the misleading impression that weight-reduced persons are energy conservative and predisposed to weight regain. Our findings do not provide evidence in support of adaptive metabolic changes as an explanation for the tendency of weight-reduced persons to regain weight.
Authors: Sai Krupa Das; Cheryl H Gilhooly; Julie K Golden; Anastassios G Pittas; Paul J Fuss; Gerard E Dallal; Megan A McCrory; Edward Saltzman; Susan B Roberts Journal: Open Nutr J Date: 2007-04-01
Authors: Darcy L Johannsen; Nicolas D Knuth; Robert Huizenga; Jennifer C Rood; Eric Ravussin; Kevin D Hall Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Crystal C Douglas; Jeannine C Lawrence; Nikki C Bush; Robert A Oster; Barbara A Gower; Betty E Darnell Journal: Nutr Res Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Stanley Heshka; Thaisa Lemos; Nerys M Astbury; Elizabeth Widen; Lance Davidson; Bret H Goodpaster; James P DeLany; Gladys W Strain; Alfons Pomp; Anita P Courcoulas; Susan Lin; Isaiah Janumala; Wen Yu; Patrick Kang; John C Thornton; Dympna Gallagher Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Gary R Hunter; Douglas R Moellering; Stephen J Carter; Barbara A Gower; Marcas M Bamman; Lyndsey M Hornbuckle; Eric P Plaisance; Gordon Fisher Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Richard A Washburn; Amanda N Szabo; Kate Lambourne; Erik A Willis; Lauren T Ptomey; Jeffery J Honas; Stephen D Herrmann; Joseph E Donnelly Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Fernando Lamarca; Mariana Silva Melendez-Araújo; Isabela Porto de Toledo; Eliane Said Dutra; Kênia Mara Baiocchi de Carvalho Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Leanne M Redman; Leonie K Heilbronn; Corby K Martin; Lilian de Jonge; Donald A Williamson; James P Delany; Eric Ravussin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-02-09 Impact factor: 3.240