Literature DB >> 11062234

The usefulness of dynamically categorizing search results.

W Pratt1, L Fagan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors' goal was to determine whether dynamic categorization, a new technique for organizing search results, is more useful than the two existing organizational techniques: relevance ranking and clustering. They define a useful tool as one that helps users learn about the kinds of information that pertain to their query, find answers to their questions efficiently and easily, and feel satisfied with their search experience.
DESIGN: Fifteen patients with breast cancer and their family members completed query-related tasks using all three tools. The authors measured the time it took the subjects to accomplish their tasks, the number of answers to the query that the subjects found in four minutes, and the number of new answers that they could recall at the end of the study. Subjects also completed a user-satisfaction questionnaire.
RESULTS: The results showed that patients with breast cancer and their family members could find significantly (P: < 0.05) more answers in a fixed amount of time and were significantly (P: < 0.05) more satisfied with their search experience when they used the dynamic categorization tool than when they used either the cluster tool or the ranking tool. Subjects indicated that the dynamic categorization tool provided an organization of search results that was more clear, easy to use, accurate, precise, and helpful than those of the other tools.
CONCLUSION: The experiments indicate that dynamic categorization is an effective and useful approach for organizing search results. Tools that use this technique will help patients and their families gain quick and easy access to important medical information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11062234      PMCID: PMC129669          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2000.0070605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  3 in total

1.  Dynamic organization of search results using the UMLS.

Authors:  W Pratt
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

2.  Toward reusable software components at the point of care.

Authors:  M S Tuttle; D D Sherertz; N E Olson; S J Nelson; M S Erlbaum; K D Keck; A N Davis; O N Suarez-Munist; S S Lipow; W G Cole; L M Fagan; R D Acuff; C E Crangle; M A Musen; S W Tu; G C Wiederhold; R W Carlson
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1996

3.  Toward an interim standard for patient-centered knowledge-access.

Authors:  M S Tuttle; D D Sherertz; L M Fagan; R W Carlson; W G Cole; P B Schipma; S J Nelson
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1993
  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Semantic clustering of answers to clinical questions.

Authors:  Jimmy Lin; Dina Demner-Fushman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

2.  Semi-Automatically Inducing Semantic Classes of Clinical Research Eligibility Criteria Using UMLS and Hierarchical Clustering.

Authors:  Zhihui Luo; Stephen B Johnson; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

3.  Dynamic categorization of clinical research eligibility criteria by hierarchical clustering.

Authors:  Zhihui Luo; Meliha Yetisgen-Yildiz; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Studying PubMed usages in the field for complex problem solving: Implications for tool design.

Authors:  Barbara Mirel; Jean Song; Jennifer Steiner Tonks; Fan Meng; Weijian Xuan; Rafiqa Ameziane
Journal:  J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol       Date:  2013-05-01

Review 5.  PubMed and beyond: a survey of web tools for searching biomedical literature.

Authors:  Zhiyong Lu
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.451

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.