Literature DB >> 11061531

A 1-year prospective study on the relationship between physical activity, markers of bone metabolism, and bone acquisition in peripubertal girls.

M Lehtonen-Veromaa1, T Möttönen, K Irjala, I Nuotio, A Leino, J Viikari.   

Abstract

We conducted a 1-yr prospective study to evaluate the association between physical activity and biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption with bone mineral acquisition in 155 peripubertal Caucasian girls (51 gymnasts, 50 runners, and 54 nonathletic controls). The bone mineral density (BMD) of the femoral neck, the greater trochanter, and the lumbar spine were measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Serum biochemical markers of bone formation (osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, amino-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen) and bone resorption (degradation product of C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen) were measured. The 1-yr increase in BMD (adjusted for age, height, Tanner stage, BMD at baseline, and increases in height and weight) of the femoral neck was 0.037 g/cm2 x yr [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.019-0.051 g/cm2 x yr), and that of the greater trochanter was 0.020 g/cm2 x yr (95% CI, 0.003-0.039 g/cm2 x yr) greater in gymnasts than in controls. The corresponding figures for gymnasts compared with runners were 0.038 g/cm2 x yr (95% CI, 0.009-0.041 g/cm2 x yr) and 0.033 g/cm2 x yr (95% CI, 0.006 to 0.043 g/cm2 x yr). The figures for the lumbar spine did not differ significantly between study groups. The baseline serum concentrations of formation markers and resorption marker accounted for 2.3-12.8% (P < 0.05) of the variation in the 1-yr increase in BMD at the femoral neck and lumbar spine. However, there was no significant difference between the levels of adjusted baseline bone turnover markers of the gymnasts, runners, and controls. The present data add considerable support to the argument that high impact mechanical loading is extremely important and beneficial for the acquisition of BMD of the hip during peripubertal years. Our results indicate also that a high rate of bone turnover, reflected as elevated bone markers, is only weakly associated with the 1-yr bone gain in peripubertal girls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11061531     DOI: 10.1210/jcem.85.10.6889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  19 in total

1.  Effect of sub-elite competitive running on bone density, body composition and sexual maturity of adolescent females.

Authors:  Jennifer A Lucas; Patricia R Lucas; Sally Vogel; Greg D Gamble; Margaret C Evans; Ian R Reid
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-05       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Dancing for bone health: a 3-year longitudinal study of bone mineral accrual across puberty in female non-elite dancers and controls.

Authors:  B L Matthews; K L Bennell; H A McKay; K M Khan; A D G Baxter-Jones; R L Mirwald; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Adaptive skeletal responses to mechanical loading during adolescence.

Authors:  David A Greene; Geraldine A Naughton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  How does exercise affect bone development during growth?

Authors:  German Vicente-Rodríguez
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Effects of Gymnastics Activities on Bone Accrual during Growth: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jaak Jürimäe; Rita Gruodyte-Raciene; Adam D G Baxter-Jones
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 6.  The National Osteoporosis Foundation's position statement on peak bone mass development and lifestyle factors: a systematic review and implementation recommendations.

Authors:  C M Weaver; C M Gordon; K F Janz; H J Kalkwarf; J M Lappe; R Lewis; M O'Karma; T C Wallace; B S Zemel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Physical activity may be a potent regulator of bone turnover biomarkers in healthy girls during preadolescence.

Authors:  Antonis Kambas; Diamanda Leontsini; Alexandra Avloniti; Athanasios Chatzinikolaou; Theodoros Stampoulis; Konstantinos Makris; Dimitrios Draganidis; Athanasios Z Jamurtas; Symeon Tournis; Ioannis G Fatouros
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Peripheral bone mineral density and its predictors in healthy school girls from two different socioeconomic groups in Delhi.

Authors:  R K Marwaha; N Tandon; D H K Reddy; K Mani; S Puri; N Aggarwal; K Grewal; S Singh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Bone density and young athletic women. An update.

Authors:  David L Nichols; Charlotte F Sanborn; Eve V Essery
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 10.  Skeletal geometry and indices of bone strength in artistic gymnasts.

Authors:  J N Dowthwaite; T A Scerpella
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.