Literature DB >> 11061440

Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morcellized cancellous bone autograft and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty: a 10- to 17-year follow-up study.

M L Welten1, B W Schreurs, P Buma, N Verdonschot, T J Slooff.   

Abstract

During the period 1979 through 1986, 69 acetabular reconstructions in 63 patients were performed with the use of autologous morcellized bone-grafts because of acetabular bone stock loss. Nine cases (10 hips) were lost to follow-up. Eleven patients (12 hips) died <10 years after surgery; none had a revision. The results for the remaining 43 patients (47 hips) were reviewed at an average interval of 12.3 years (range, 10-17 years). No preoperative Harris hip score was available. The average Harris hip score at follow-up was 88 (range, 60-100). Radiographically, all grafts united. One hip developed a deep infection. Three other hips (6%) were revised because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. An additional 3 acetabular components were considered radiographic failures. Excluding the infected case, the overall survival rate of these acetabular reconstructions with a revision as endpoint was 94% at an average follow-up of 12.3 years. Reconstruction of acetabular bone stock loss with autologous morcellized bone-grafts is an attractive technique with a good potential for long-term success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11061440     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2000.7110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  Cavitary acetabular defects treated with morselized cancellous bone graft and cementless cups.

Authors:  G C T Pereira; E N Kubiak; B Levine; F S Chen; P E Di Cesare
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty with Acetabular Bone Defects: Are Biological Grafts Really Better than Synthetic Bone Graft Substitutes?

Authors:  Luca Costanzo Comba; Enrico Bellato; Danilo Colombero; Lorenzo Mattei; Antongiulio Marmotti; Filippo Castoldi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-07

3.  Impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture.

Authors:  Eelco Bronsema; Martijn A J te Stroet; Maartje Zengerink; Albert van Kampen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup.

Authors:  Martín A Buttaro; Fernando Comba; Rodolfo Pusso; Francisco Piccaluga
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Treatment of large acetabular defects: a surgical technique utilizing impaction grafting into a metallic mesh.

Authors:  Johannes Buckup; Emiliano Alvarez Salinas; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-08-15

6.  Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup.

Authors:  Nienke van Egmond; Daniel C J De Kam; Jean W M Gardeniers; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Does a cemented cage improve revision THA for severe acetabular defects?

Authors:  Erik Hansen; David Shearer; Michael D Ries
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Total hip arthroplasty to treat acetabular protrusions secondary to rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Ping Zhen; Xusheng Li; Shenghu Zhou; Hao Lu; Hui Chen; Jun Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Results of Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty in 477 Patients.

Authors:  Guydo Marques Horta Duarte; Luiz Ronaldo Alberti
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-08-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.