Literature DB >> 11060183

Patient tolerance of colonoscopy without sedation during screening examination for colorectal polyps.

E Thiis-Evensen1, G S Hoff, J Sauar, M H Vatn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The administration of sedative drugs at colonoscopy has its drawbacks such as increases in the rate of complications and cost. Our aim was to study how individuals, drawn from a population registry and invited to undergo screening colonoscopy for colorectal polyps, experienced the procedure without conscious sedation.
METHODS: Four hundred fifty-one individuals underwent the screening examination (median age 67 years, range 63 to 72). The cecum was intubated in 369 (82%). Fourteen days after the examination, 429 of the attendees received a questionnaire designed to evaluate their tolerance of the procedure.
RESULTS: Four hundred nine participants (95%) replied.Twenty-one (5%) of these individuals found the examination very uncomfortable, 184 (45%) found it moderately uncomfortable, and 204 (50%) did not find it uncomfortable. A larger proportion of women than men, 110 (63%) versus 79 (41%), found the procedure very or moderately uncomfortable (p<0.001). Three hundred sixty-eight (90%) individuals stated that they would undergo repeat colonoscopy in 5 years.
CONCLUSION: In this screening setting, routine use of conscious sedation did not seem to be necessary, as most participants found the examination to be only moderately uncomfortable or not at all uncomfortable. Colonoscopy without conscious sedation may, however, reduce the rate of intubation of the cecum and increase the risk of missing adenomas and cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11060183     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2000.109804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  15 in total

1.  Sedation-risk-free colonoscopy for minimizing the burden of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Felix W Leung; Abdulrahman M Aljebreen; Emilio Brocchi; Eugene B Chang; Wei-Chih Liao; Takeshi Mizukami; Melvin Schapiro; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-03-16

Review 2.  Water infusion versus air insufflation for colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  D Hu; Y Xu; Y Sun; Q Zhu
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Sedation, analgesia, and cardiorespiratory function in colonoscopy using midazolam combined with fentanyl or propofol.

Authors:  Fen Wang; Shou-Rong Shen; Ding-Hua Xiao; Can-Xia Xu; Wu-Liang Tang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Methods of reducing discomfort during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Felix W Leung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Single use of fentanyl in colonoscopy is safe and effective and significantly shortens recovery time.

Authors:  G Lazaraki; J Kountouras; S Metallidis; S Dokas; T Bakaloudis; D Chatzopoulos; E Gavalas; C Zavos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia According to Fatty Liver Severity and Presence of Gall Bladder Polyps.

Authors:  Taeyoung Lee; Kyung Eun Yun; Yoosoo Chang; Seungho Ryu; Dong Il Park; Kyuyong Choi; Yoon Suk Jung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Endoscopic follow-up of positive fecal occult blood testing in the Ontario FOBT Project.

Authors:  Lawrence Paszat; Linda Rabeneck; Lori Kiefer; Verna Mai; Paul Ritvo; Terry Sullivan
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.522

8.  Premedication with tramadol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Laurino Grossi; Giorgio Cappello; Leonardo Marzio
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Sedated vs unsedated colonoscopy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M Aljebreen; Majid A Almadi; Felix W Leung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Patient comfort and quality in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Vivian E Ekkelenkamp; Kevin Dowler; Roland M Valori; Paul Dunckley
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.