Literature DB >> 11059437

Do automated calls with nurse follow-up improve self-care and glycemic control among vulnerable patients with diabetes?

J D Piette1, M Weinberger, S J McPhee, C A Mah, F B Kraemer, L M Crapo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the effect of automated telephone assessment and self-care education calls with nurse follow-up on the management of diabetes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 280 English- or Spanish-speaking adults with diabetes who were using hypoglycemic medications and who were treated in a county health care system. Patients were randomly assigned to usual care or to receive an intervention that consisted of usual care plus bi-weekly automated assessment and self-care education calls with telephone follow-up by a nurse educator. Outcomes measured at 12 months included survey-reported self-care, perceived glycemic control, and symptoms, as well as glycosylated hemoglobin (Hb A1c) and serum glucose levels.
RESULTS: We collected follow-up data for 89% of enrollees (248 patients). Compared with usual care patients, intervention patients reported more frequent glucose monitoring, foot inspection, and weight monitoring, and fewer problems with medication adherence (all P -0.03). Follow-up Hb A,, levels were 0.3% lower in the intervention group (P = 0.1), and about twice as many intervention patients had Hb A1c levels within the normal range (P = 0.04). Serum glucose levels were 41 mg/dL lower among intervention patients than usual care patients (P = 0.002). Intervention patients also reported better glycemic control (P = 0.005) and fewer diabetic symptoms (P <0.0001 ), including fewer symptoms of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia.
CONCLUSIONS: Automated calls with telephone nurse follow-up may be an effective strategy for improving self-care behavior and glycemic control, and for decreasing symptoms among vulnerable patients with diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11059437     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00298-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  82 in total

Review 1.  Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  R Roine; A Ohinmaa; D Hailey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Adherence to nicotine replacement therapy versus quitting smoking among Chinese smokers: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Tai-Hing Lam; Abu Saleh M Abdullah; Sophia S C Chan; Anthony J Hedley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  A systematic review of interactive computer-assisted technology in diabetes care. Interactive information technology in diabetes care.

Authors:  Chandra L Jackson; Shari Bolen; Frederick L Brancati; Marian L Batts-Turner; Tiffany L Gary
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Interventions in primary care to reduce medication related adverse events and hospital admissions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Royal; L Smeaton; A J Avery; B Hurwitz; A Sheikh
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-02

5.  Primary care in the United States: organisation of primary care in the United States.

Authors:  Andrew B Bindman; Azeem Majeed
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-03-22

6.  Health Care Disparities and Diabetes Care: Practical Considerations for Primary Care Providers.

Authors:  Richard O White; Bettina M Beech; Stephania Miller
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2009-06

Review 7.  Patient-centered diabetes self-management education.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Williams; Allan Zeldman
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 8.  Enhancing support via interactive technologies.

Authors:  John D Piette
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.810

9.  Engagement with automated patient monitoring and self-management support calls: experience with a thousand chronically ill patients.

Authors:  John D Piette; Ann-Marie Rosland; Nicolle S Marinec; Dana Striplin; Steven J Bernstein; Maria J Silveira
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Shared treatment decision making improves adherence and outcomes in poorly controlled asthma.

Authors:  Sandra R Wilson; Peg Strub; A Sonia Buist; Sarah B Knowles; Philip W Lavori; Jodi Lapidus; William M Vollmer
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 21.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.