Literature DB >> 11057667

The proteins of linked genes evolve at similar rates.

E J Williams1, L D Hurst.   

Abstract

Much more variation in the rate of protein evolution occurs than is expected by chance. But why some proteins evolve rapidly but others slowly is poorly resolved. It was proposed, for example, that essential genes might evolve slower than dispensable ones, but this is not the case; and despite earlier claims, rates of evolution do not correlate with amino-acid composition. A few patterns have been found: proteins involved in antagonistic co-evolution (for example, immune genes, parasite antigens and reproductive conflict genes) tend to be rapidly evolving, and there is a correlation between the rate of protein evolution and the mutation rate of the gene. Here we report a new highly statistically significant predictor of a protein's rate of evolution, and show that linked genes have similar rates of protein evolution. There is also a weaker similarity of rates of silent site evolution (see ref. 13), which appears to be, in part, a consequence of the similarity in rates of protein evolution. The similarity in rates of protein evolution is not a consequence of underlying mutational patterns. A pronounced negative correlation between the rate of protein evolution and a covariant of the recombination rate indicates that rates of protein evolution possibly reflect, in part, the local strength of stabilizing selection.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11057667     DOI: 10.1038/35038066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  33 in total

1.  Patterns in interspecies similarity correlate with nucleotide composition in mammalian 3'UTRs.

Authors:  Svetlana A Shabalina; Aleksey Y Ogurtsov; David J Lipman; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Testing the chromosomal speciation hypothesis for humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Jianzhi Zhang; Xiaoxia Wang; Ondrej Podlaha
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Molecular evolution in large genetic networks: does connectivity equal constraint?

Authors:  Matthew W Hahn; Gavin C Conant; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 4.  Variation in the mutation rate across mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Alan Hodgkinson; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Comparison of the chicken and turkey genomes reveals a higher rate of nucleotide divergence on microchromosomes than macrochromosomes.

Authors:  Erik Axelsson; Matthew T Webster; Nick G C Smith; David W Burt; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 6.  Complex networks and simple models in biology.

Authors:  Eric de Silva; Michael P H Stumpf
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Protein evolutionary rates correlate with expression independently of synonymous substitutions in Helicobacter pylori.

Authors:  Björn Sällström; Ramy A Arnaout; Wagied Davids; Pär Bjelkmar; Siv G E Andersson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Functional bias in molecular evolution rate of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Andrew S Warren; Ramu Anandakrishnan; Liqing Zhang
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  The genomic distribution and local context of coincident SNPs in human and chimpanzee.

Authors:  Alan Hodgkinson; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Gene socialization: gene order, GC content and gene silencing in Salmonella.

Authors:  Nikolas Papanikolaou; Kalliopi Trachana; Theodosios Theodosiou; Vasilis J Promponas; Ioannis Iliopoulos
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.