Literature DB >> 11052501

Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation of MG63 osteoblast-like cells affects differentiation and local factor production.

C H Lohmann1, Z Schwartz, Y Liu, H Guerkov, D D Dean, B Simon, B D Boyan.   

Abstract

Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation has been used to promote the healing of chronic nonunions and fractures with delayed healing, but relatively little is known about its effects on osteogenic cells or the mechanisms involved. The purpose of this study was to examine the response of osteoblast-like cells to a pulsed electromagnetic field signal used clinically and to determine if the signal modulates the production of autocrine factors associated with differentiation. Confluent cultures of MG63 human osteoblast-like cells were placed between Helmholtz coils and exposed to a pulsed electromagnetic signal consisting of a burst of 20 pulses repeating at 15 Hz for 8 hours per day for 1, 2, or 4 days. Controls were cultured under identical conditions, but no signal was applied. Treated and control cultures were alternated between two comparable incubators and, therefore, between active coils; measurement of the temperature of the incubators and the culture medium indicated that application of the signal did not generate heat above the level found in the control incubator or culture medium. The pulsed electromagnetic signal caused a reduction in cell proliferation on the basis of cell number and [3H]thymidine incorporation. Cellular alkaline phosphatase-specific activity increased in the cultures exposed to the signal, with maximum effects at day 1. In contrast, enzyme activity in the cell-layer lysates, which included alkaline phosphatase-enriched extracellular matrix vesicles, continued to increase with the time of exposure to the signal. After 1 and 2 days of exposure, collagen synthesis and osteocalcin production were greater than in the control cultures. Prostaglandin E2 in the treated cultures was significantly reduced at 1 and 2 days, whereas transforming growth factor-beta1 was increased; at 4 days of treatment, however, the levels of both local factors were similar to those in the controls. The results indicate enhanced differentiation as the net effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on osteoblasts, as evidenced by decreased proliferation and increased alkaline phosphatase-specific activity, osteocalcin synthesis, and collagen production. Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation appears to promote the production of matrix vesicles on the basis of higher levels of alkaline phosphatase at 4 days in the cell layers than in the isolated cells, commensurate with osteogenic differentiation in response to transforming growth factor-beta1. The results indicate that osteoblasts are sensitive to pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation, which alters cell activity through changes in local factor production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11052501     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100180417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  36 in total

1.  Static magnetic field exposure promotes differentiation of osteoblastic cells grown on the surface of a poly-L-lactide substrate.

Authors:  Sheng-Wei Feng; Yi-June Lo; Wei-Jen Chang; Che-Tong Lin; Sheng-Yang Lee; Yoshimitsu Abiko; Haw-Ming Huang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Effect of electromagnetic fields on proliferation and differentiation of cultured mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Hua Wu; Kai Ren; Wenchun Zhao; G E Baojian; Songlin Peng
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2005

Review 3.  Electrical stimulation therapies for spinal fusions: current concepts.

Authors:  Jean C Gan; Paul A Glazer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Electrical polarization of titanium surfaces for the enhancement of osteoblast differentiation.

Authors:  Rolando A Gittens; Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Robert Rettew; Robert J Butera; Faisal M Alamgir; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.010

5.  Pulsed direct current electric fields enhance osteogenesis in adipose-derived stromal cells.

Authors:  Kyle E Hammerick; Aaron W James; Zubin Huang; Fritz B Prinz; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Low-level laser therapy vs. pulsed electromagnetic field on neonatal rat calvarial osteoblast-like cells.

Authors:  Yusuf Emes; Kivanç Akça; Buket Aybar; Serhat Yalçın; Yeliz Çavuşoğlu; Uğur Baysal; Halim Işsever; Belir Atalay; Pervin Vural; Mine Ergüven; Murat Cavit Çehreli; Ayhan Bilir
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-08-05       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields inhibit bone loss in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.

Authors:  Jun Zhou; Xinhong Li; Ying Liao; Weibing Feng; Chengxiao Fu; Xin Guo
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 8.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields: promising treatment for osteoporosis.

Authors:  T Wang; L Yang; J Jiang; Y Liu; Z Fan; C Zhong; C He
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Effects of sinusoidal electromagnetic field on structure and function of different kinds of cell lines.

Authors:  Ah Ram Sul; Si-Nae Park; Hwal Suh
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2006-12-31       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on human osteoblastlike cells (MG-63): a pilot study.

Authors:  Vincenzo Sollazzo; Annalisa Palmieri; Furio Pezzetti; Leo Massari; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.