Literature DB >> 22865122

Low-level laser therapy vs. pulsed electromagnetic field on neonatal rat calvarial osteoblast-like cells.

Yusuf Emes1, Kivanç Akça, Buket Aybar, Serhat Yalçın, Yeliz Çavuşoğlu, Uğur Baysal, Halim Işsever, Belir Atalay, Pervin Vural, Mine Ergüven, Murat Cavit Çehreli, Ayhan Bilir.   

Abstract

To compare the effects of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on osteoblast cells in a cell culture model. Fifty thousand neonatal rat calvarial osteoblast-like cells per milliliter were seeded and 0.06 mT PEMF, 0.2 mT PEMF, and LLLT at 808 nm were applied for 24 and 96 h on the cells. To evaluate cellular proliferation and differentiation, specimens were examined for DNA synthesis, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, cell numbers, and viability of the cells. Morphological appearances of the cells were observed using scanning electron microcopy after 24 and 96 h of incubation. At 24 and 96 h, the control group had a higher cell proliferation than 0.06 and 0.2 mT PEMF groups (p=0.001). At 96 h, 0.2 mT PEMF group had higher cell proliferation rate than 0.06 mT PEMF and LLLT groups (p=0.001). The cell count and cell viability in 0.2 mT PEMF group were higher than the 0.06-mT PEMF and LLLT groups, although these differences were not statistically significant at 96 h (p>0.05). At 24 and 96 h, cell viability in the control group was higher than the test groups. Alkaline phosphatase levels of the groups were comparable in both time intervals (p>0.05). 0.2 mT PEMF application on osteoblast-like cells led to cell proliferation and differentiation better than 0.06 mT PEMF and LLLT at 808 nm, although a remarkable effect of both PEMF and LLLT could not be detected. The ALP activity of 0.2 and 0.06 mT PEMF and LLLT were comparable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22865122     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-012-1165-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  32 in total

1.  The effects of low level laser irradiation on osteoblastic cells.

Authors:  A R Coombe; C T Ho; M A Darendeliler; N Hunter; J R Philips; C C Chapple; L W Yum
Journal:  Clin Orthod Res       Date:  2001-02

2.  Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation on bone tissue like formation are dependent on the maturation stages of the osteoblasts.

Authors:  Pericles Diniz; Kenji Shomura; Kazuhisa Soejima; Gakuji Ito
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.010

3.  Low-energy laser irradiation stimulates bone nodule formation at early stages of cell culture in rat calvarial cells.

Authors:  Y Ozawa; N Shimizu; G Kariya; Y Abiko
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Systemic effects of low-power laser irradiation on the peripheral and central nervous system, cutaneous wounds, and burns.

Authors:  S Rochkind; M Rousso; M Nissan; M Villarreal; L Barr-Nea; D G Rees
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.025

5.  Prevention of osteoporosis by pulsed electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  C T Rubin; K J McLeod; L E Lanyon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Enhancement of bone formation in rat calvarial bone defects using low-level laser therapy.

Authors:  Maawan Khadra; Nesrin Kasem; Hans R Haanaes; Jan E Ellingsen; Ståle P Lyngstadaas
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2004-06

7.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields rapidly modulate intracellular signaling events in osteoblastic cells: comparison to parathyroid hormone and insulin.

Authors:  Matthew Schnoke; Ronald J Midura
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Effects of BMP-2 and pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) on rat primary osteoblastic cell proliferation and gene expression.

Authors:  Nagarajan Selvamurugan; Sukyee Kwok; Anatoliy Vasilov; Stephen C Jefcoat; Nicola C Partridge
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Effects of bone morphogenetic protein on neonatal rat calvarial osteoblast-like cells: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Buket Aybar; Yusuf Emes; Belir Atalay; Pervin Vural; A Selhan Kaya; Selame N Eren; Halim Işsever; Ayhan Bilir
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Micro-morphologic changes around biophysically-stimulated titanium implants in ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Kivanc Akca; Ebru Sarac; Ugur Baysal; Mete Fanuscu; Ting-Ling Chang; Murat Cehreli
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 2.151

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The impact of photobiomodulation on osteoblast-like cell: a review.

Authors:  Alessandro Melo Deana; Ana Maria de Souza; Victor Perez Teixeira; Raquel Agneli Mesquita-Ferrari; Sandra Kalil Bussadori; Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Evaluation of pulsed electromagnetic field protocols in implant osseointegration: in vivo and in vitro study.

Authors:  Camilla Magnoni Moretto Nunes; Camila Lopes Ferreira; Daniella Vicensotto Bernardo; Cássia Carolina Rabelo Lopes; Luma Collino; Victória Clara da Silva Lima; Daphne de Camargo Reis Mello; Luana Marotta Reis de Vasconcellos; Maria Aparecida Neves Jardini
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Red (635 nm), Near-Infrared (808 nm) and Violet-Blue (405 nm) Photobiomodulation Potentiality on Human Osteoblasts and Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: A Morphological and Molecular In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Alessia Tani; Flaminia Chellini; Marco Giannelli; Daniele Nosi; Sandra Zecchi-Orlandini; Chiara Sassoli
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  In Vitro Cytological Responses against Laser Photobiomodulation for Periodontal Regeneration.

Authors:  Yujin Ohsugi; Hiromi Niimi; Tsuyoshi Shimohira; Masahiro Hatasa; Sayaka Katagiri; Akira Aoki; Takanori Iwata
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.