Literature DB >> 11050784

The cost-effectiveness of lipid lowering in patients with ischaemic heart disease: an intervention and evaluation in primary care.

J Hippisley-Cox1, M Pringle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been a major revolution in the recommended treatment of hyperlipidaemia in patients with ischaemic heart disease following the publication of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. This was the first major study to demonstrate that lipid-lowering drugs reduced mortality and morbidity in patients with ischaemic heart disease. AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of screening and treating hyperlipidaemia in patients with ischaemic heart disease in primary care.
METHOD: A study conducted in a rural dispensing training practice on the border of Nottinghamshire and Lincolnshire involving 327 patients with ischaemic heart disease who were registered with the practice on 1 January 1996.
RESULTS: Eighty per cent of patients with ischaemic heart disease were considered eligible for screening and 80% of those attended for screening. The majority of patients who were screened had hyperlipidaemia that persisted after dietary advice. Despite lipid-lowering drugs, few patients had serum lipid concentrations in the target range at the end of six months. The costs of identifying and treating 83 patients with lipid-lowering drugs over five years is estimated at 105,318 Pounds at 1996 prices, or 94,257 Pounds assuming a 6% discount rate per annum. Two-thirds of this is owing to the cost of lipid-lowering drugs. The discounted cost per coronary event prevented would be 17,138 Pounds (95% CI = 12,568 Pounds-26,183 Pounds). The discounted cost per coronary death prevented would be 32,502 Pounds (95% CI = 23,564 Pounds-55,445 Pounds). There were no important adverse effects of lipid-lowering drugs on quality of life or mood.
CONCLUSION: Such a programme is feasible and acceptable within primary care, although the ongoing cost implications need to be considered against the costs and benefits of other interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11050784      PMCID: PMC1313796     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  15 in total

1.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Lowering patients' cholesterol. Extrapolating results of trial of simvastatin gives room for doubt.

Authors:  J Hippisley-Cox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-09

Review 3.  Preventing ischaemic heart disease in one general practice: from one patient, through clinical audit, needs assessment, and commissioning into quality improvement.

Authors:  M Pringle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-24

4.  The use of statins: a case of misleading priorities?

Authors:  N Freemantle; R Barbour; R Johnson; M Marchment; A Kennedy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-10-04

5.  Managing established coronary heart disease.

Authors:  M Moher; T Schofield; S Weston; E Fullard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-07-12

6.  Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in four practices committed to recording data on computer.

Authors:  M Pringle; P Ward; C Chilvers
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Lower patients' cholesterol now.

Authors:  M Oliver; P Poole-Wilson; J Shepherd; M J Tikkanen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-05-20

8.  Dietary reduction of serum cholesterol concentration: time to think again.

Authors:  L E Ramsay; W W Yeo; P R Jackson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-10-19

9.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Authors:  A S Zigmond; R P Snaith
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.392

10.  Strategies for reducing coronary risk factors in primary care: which is most cost effective?

Authors:  K Field; M Thorogood; C Silagy; C Normand; C O'Neill; J Muir
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-04-29
View more
  2 in total

1.  Treating the patient or the population? Part 1. Judging the benefit of treatment of individual patients.

Authors:  T D Heller; R F Heller; S Pattison; R Fletcher
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-07

2.  Summary of scientific evidence.

Authors: 
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  2002-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.