K G Davis1, W S Marras. 1. Biodynamics Laboratory, Room 210, 210 Baker Systems, 1971 Neil Avenue, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the literature that evaluates the influence of trunk motion on trunk strength and structural loading. BACKGROUND: In recent years, trunk dynamics have been identified as potential risk factors for developing low-back disorders. Consequently, a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in trunk motion is needed. METHODS: This review summarizes the results of 53 studies that have evaluated trunk motion and its impact on several biomechanical outcome measures. The biomechanical measures consisted of trunk strength, intra-abdominal pressure, muscle activity, imposed trunk moments, and spinal loads. Each of these biomechanical measures was discussed in relation to the existing knowledge within each plane of motion (extension, flexion, lateral flexion, twisting, and asymmetric extension). RESULTS: Trunk strength was drastically reduced as dynamic motion increased, and males were impacted more than females. Intra-abdominal pressure seemed to only be affected by trunk dynamics at high levels of force. Trunk moments were found to increase monotonically with increased trunk motion. Both agonistic and antagonistic muscle activities were greater as dynamic characteristics increased. As a result, the three-dimensional spinal loads increase significantly for dynamic exertions as compared to isometric conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Trunk motion has a dramatic affect on the muscle coactivity, which seems to be the underlying source for the decrease strength capability as well as the increased muscle force, IAP, and spinal loads. This review suggests that the ability of the individual to perform a task "safely" might be significantly compromised by the muscle coactivity that accompanies dynamic exertions. It is also important to consider various workplace and individual factors when attempting to reduce the impact of trunk motions during dynamic exertions. Relevance This review provides insight as to why trunk motions are important risk factors to consider when attempting to control low-back disorders in the workplace. It is apparent that trunk motion increases the risk of low-back disorders. To better control low-back disorders in industry, more comprehensive knowledge about the impact of trunk motion is needed. A better understanding of muscle coactivity may ultimately lead to reducing the risk associated with dynamic exertions.
OBJECTIVE: To review the literature that evaluates the influence of trunk motion on trunk strength and structural loading. BACKGROUND: In recent years, trunk dynamics have been identified as potential risk factors for developing low-back disorders. Consequently, a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in trunk motion is needed. METHODS: This review summarizes the results of 53 studies that have evaluated trunk motion and its impact on several biomechanical outcome measures. The biomechanical measures consisted of trunk strength, intra-abdominal pressure, muscle activity, imposed trunk moments, and spinal loads. Each of these biomechanical measures was discussed in relation to the existing knowledge within each plane of motion (extension, flexion, lateral flexion, twisting, and asymmetric extension). RESULTS: Trunk strength was drastically reduced as dynamic motion increased, and males were impacted more than females. Intra-abdominal pressure seemed to only be affected by trunk dynamics at high levels of force. Trunk moments were found to increase monotonically with increased trunk motion. Both agonistic and antagonistic muscle activities were greater as dynamic characteristics increased. As a result, the three-dimensional spinal loads increase significantly for dynamic exertions as compared to isometric conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Trunk motion has a dramatic affect on the muscle coactivity, which seems to be the underlying source for the decrease strength capability as well as the increased muscle force, IAP, and spinal loads. This review suggests that the ability of the individual to perform a task "safely" might be significantly compromised by the muscle coactivity that accompanies dynamic exertions. It is also important to consider various workplace and individual factors when attempting to reduce the impact of trunk motions during dynamic exertions. Relevance This review provides insight as to why trunk motions are important risk factors to consider when attempting to control low-back disorders in the workplace. It is apparent that trunk motion increases the risk of low-back disorders. To better control low-back disorders in industry, more comprehensive knowledge about the impact of trunk motion is needed. A better understanding of muscle coactivity may ultimately lead to reducing the risk associated with dynamic exertions.
Authors: Julian C Acasio; Iman Shojaei; Rajit Banerjee; Christopher L Dearth; Babak Bazrgari; Brad D Hendershot Journal: J Biomech Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Brecca M M Gaffney; Cory L Christiansen; Amanda M Murray; Bradley S Davidson Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2017-07-29 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Brad D Hendershot; Iman Shojaei; Julian C Acasio; Christopher L Dearth; Babak Bazrgari Journal: J Biomech Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Nathan B Fethke; Mark C Schall; Howard Chen; Cassidy A Branch; Linda A Merlino Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 2.155