Literature DB >> 11044348

New treatments for advanced cancer: an approach to prioritization.

J S Ferguson1, M Summerhayes, S Masters, S Schey, I E Smith.   

Abstract

The allocation of funding for new anticancer treatments within the UK has not kept pace with demand. Clinicians find themselves restricted in the use of licensed drugs which they feel are in the best interests of individual patients. Against this, health authorities have a duty to ensure that scarce resources are used equitably to meet the needs of the local population as a whole. Differential levels of funding for new treatments across the country have led to concerns about rationing by postcode. This paper outlines an approach to the prioritization of new treatment for advanced cancer developed jointly by clinicians and health authorities in South London. The approach involves evidence reviews and consensus meetings. Existing and new treatments are rated on a four-point 'relative effectiveness scale', which takes account of the impact of the treatment on quality of life and on survival. The strength of evidence supporting each effectiveness rating is also classified. Health Authorities have used these ratings to determine overall funding levels, while leaving decisions on individual patients to the relevant Trusts. Copyright 2000 Cancer Research Campaign.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11044348      PMCID: PMC2408788          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  15 in total

Review 1.  Perspectives of commissioners and cancer specialists in prioritising new cancer drugs: impact of the evidence threshold.

Authors:  R Foy; J So; E Rous; J H Scarffe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-13

2.  A comparison of subjective responses in a trial comparing endocrine with cytotoxic treatment in advanced carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  M Baum; T Priestman; R R West; E M Jones
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Quality of life during cytostatic therapy for advanced symptomatic colorectal carcinoma: a randomized comparison of two regimens.

Authors:  B Glimelius; K Hoffman; M Olafsdottir; L Påhlman; P O Sjödén; A Wennberg
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-05

4.  Quality of life of lung cancer patients in a randomized clinical trial evaluated by a psychosocial well-being questionnaire.

Authors:  S Kaasa; A Mastekaasa; S Naess
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.089

5.  Improving the quality of life during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. A comparison of intermittent and continuous treatment strategies.

Authors:  A Coates; V Gebski; J F Bishop; P N Jeal; R L Woods; R Snyder; M H Tattersall; M Byrne; V Harvey; G Gill
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Preferences for chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: descriptive study based on scripted interviews.

Authors:  G Silvestri; R Pritchard; H G Welch
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-09-19

8.  Attitudes to chemotherapy: comparing views of patients with cancer with those of doctors, nurses, and general public.

Authors:  M L Slevin; L Stubbs; H J Plant; P Wilson; W M Gregory; P J Armes; S M Downer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-06-02

9.  Measuring psychological and physical distress in cancer patients: structure and application of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist.

Authors:  J C de Haes; F C van Knippenberg; J P Neijt
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Do patients with advanced breast cancer benefit from chemotherapy?

Authors:  A J Ramirez; K E Towlson; M S Leaning; M A Richards; R D Rubens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  Role of the hospital pharmacy and therapeutics committee in detecting and regulating off-label drug use.

Authors:  Jaime E Vargas-Rivas; Daniel Sabater-Hernández; Miguel A Calleja-Hernández; María J Faus; Fernando Martínez-Martínez
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2011-08-17

2.  The Budget Impact of Monoclonal Antibodies Used to Treat Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Authors:  Wânia Cristina da Silva; Brian Godman; Francisco de Assis Acúrcio; Mariângela Leal Cherchiglia; Antony Martin; Konrad Maruszczyk; Jans Bastos Izidoro; Marcos André Portella; Agner Pereira Lana; Orozimbo Henriques Campos Neto; Eli Iola Gurgel Andrade
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.561

Review 3.  Adaptive Pathways: Possible Next Steps for Payers in Preparation for Their Potential Implementation.

Authors:  Patricia Vella Bonanno; Michael Ermisch; Brian Godman; Antony P Martin; Jesper Van Den Bergh; Liudmila Bezmelnitsyna; Anna Bucsics; Francis Arickx; Alexander Bybau; Tomasz Bochenek; Marc van de Casteele; Eduardo Diogene; Irene Eriksson; Jurij Fürst; Mohamed Gad; Ieva Greičiūtė-Kuprijanov; Martin van der Graaff; Jolanta Gulbinovic; Jan Jones; Roberta Joppi; Marija Kalaba; Ott Laius; Irene Langner; Ileana Mardare; Vanda Markovic-Pekovic; Einar Magnusson; Oyvind Melien; Dmitry O Meshkov; Guenka I Petrova; Gisbert Selke; Catherine Sermet; Steven Simoens; Ad Schuurman; Ricardo Ramos; Jorge Rodrigues; Corinne Zara; Eva Zebedin-Brandl; Alan Haycox
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies (Bevacizumab, Cetuximab, and Panitumumab) in Combination with Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wânia Cristina da Silva; Vânia Eloisa de Araujo; Ellias Magalhães E Abreu Lima; Jessica Barreto Ribeiro Dos Santos; Michael Ruberson Ribeiro da Silva; Paulo Henrique Ribeiro Fernandes Almeida; Francisco de Assis Acurcio; Brian Godman; Amanj Kurdi; Mariângela Leal Cherchiglia; Eli Iola Gurgel Andrade
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.807

5.  Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in Metastatic Non-Squamous and Squamous NSCLC Patients With PD-L1 Expression ≥ 50.

Authors:  Qiao Liu; Zhen Zhou; Xia Luo; Lidan Yi; Liubao Peng; Xiaomin Wan; Chongqing Tan; Xiaohui Zeng
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Longitudinal trends in use and costs of targeted therapies for common cancers in Taiwan: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Jason C Hsu; Christine Y Lu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.