M I Cohen1, N D Bridges, J W Gaynor, T M Hoffman, G Wernovsky, V L Vetter, T L Spray, L A Rhodes. 1. Divisions of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery and The Departments of Pediatrics and Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. mi@email.chop.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether operations that theoretically jeopardize the sinus node (hemi-Fontan and/or lateral tunnel Fontan procedures) are associated with a greater risk of sinus node dysfunction than those that theoretically spare the sinus node (bidirectional Glenn and/or extracardiac conduit). METHODS: Between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 1999, a prospective cohort study was conducted evaluating the incidence of sinus node dysfunction in patients undergoing a bidirectional Glenn or hemi-Fontan procedure and those in whom the Fontan repair was completed with either an extracardiac conduit or a lateral tunnel. Sinus node dysfunction was defined (1) as a heart rate more than 2 SD below age-adjusted norms or (2) as a predominant junctional rhythm and/or a sinus pause of more than 3 seconds as determined by the resting electrocardiogram and/or ambulatory monitoring at hospital discharge. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients had a bidirectional Glenn shunt (mean age 7.8 +/- 5.1 months) and 79 a hemi-Fontan procedure (mean age 6.9 +/- 2.8 months). The incidence of sinus node dysfunction on postoperative day 1 was significantly higher after the hemi-Fontan (36%) than after the bidirectional Glenn shunt (9.8%); however, by hospital discharge this difference was no longer apparent (hemi-Fontan [8%]; bidirectional Glenn [6%]; P = not significant). No difference in early sinus node dysfunction was discernible after the extracardiac conduit (4/30 [13%]) compared with the lateral tunnel Fontan procedure (6/46 [13%]) (P = not significant). No diagnostic or perioperative variables were predictive of sinus node dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Avoidance of surgery near the sinus node has no discernible effect on the development of early sinus node dysfunction. Thus, concerns about early sinus node dysfunction should not override patient anatomy or surgeon preference as determinants of which cavopulmonary anastomosis to perform.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether operations that theoretically jeopardize the sinus node (hemi-Fontan and/or lateral tunnel Fontan procedures) are associated with a greater risk of sinus node dysfunction than those that theoretically spare the sinus node (bidirectional Glenn and/or extracardiac conduit). METHODS: Between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 1999, a prospective cohort study was conducted evaluating the incidence of sinus node dysfunction in patients undergoing a bidirectional Glenn or hemi-Fontan procedure and those in whom the Fontan repair was completed with either an extracardiac conduit or a lateral tunnel. Sinus node dysfunction was defined (1) as a heart rate more than 2 SD below age-adjusted norms or (2) as a predominant junctional rhythm and/or a sinus pause of more than 3 seconds as determined by the resting electrocardiogram and/or ambulatory monitoring at hospital discharge. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients had a bidirectional Glenn shunt (mean age 7.8 +/- 5.1 months) and 79 a hemi-Fontan procedure (mean age 6.9 +/- 2.8 months). The incidence of sinus node dysfunction on postoperative day 1 was significantly higher after the hemi-Fontan (36%) than after the bidirectional Glenn shunt (9.8%); however, by hospital discharge this difference was no longer apparent (hemi-Fontan [8%]; bidirectional Glenn [6%]; P = not significant). No difference in early sinus node dysfunction was discernible after the extracardiac conduit (4/30 [13%]) compared with the lateral tunnel Fontan procedure (6/46 [13%]) (P = not significant). No diagnostic or perioperative variables were predictive of sinus node dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Avoidance of surgery near the sinus node has no discernible effect on the development of early sinus node dysfunction. Thus, concerns about early sinus node dysfunction should not override patient anatomy or surgeon preference as determinants of which cavopulmonary anastomosis to perform.
Authors: Katarzyna Januszewska; Anna Schuh; Anja Lehner; Robert Dalla-Pozza; Edward Malec Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Andrew M Atz; Thomas G Travison; Brian W McCrindle; Lynn Mahony; Andrew C Glatz; Aditya K Kaza; Roger E Breitbart; Steven D Colan; Jonathan R Kaltman; Renee Margossian; Sara K Pasquali; Yanli Wang; Welton M Gersony Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 1.093
Authors: Jeffrey A Feinstein; D Woodrow Benson; Anne M Dubin; Meryl S Cohen; Dawn M Maxey; William T Mahle; Elfriede Pahl; Juan Villafañe; Ami B Bhatt; Lynn F Peng; Beth Ann Johnson; Alison L Marsden; Curt J Daniels; Nancy A Rudd; Christopher A Caldarone; Kathleen A Mussatto; David L Morales; D Dunbar Ivy; J William Gaynor; James S Tweddell; Barbara J Deal; Anke K Furck; Geoffrey L Rosenthal; Richard G Ohye; Nancy S Ghanayem; John P Cheatham; Wayne Tworetzky; Gerard R Martin Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Bhavya Trivedi; P Brian Smith; Piers C A Barker; James Jaggers; Andrew J Lodge; Ronald J Kanter Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Andrew D Blaufox; Lynn A Sleeper; David J Bradley; Roger E Breitbart; Allan Hordof; Ronald J Kanter; Elizabeth A Stephenson; Mario Stylianou; Victoria L Vetter; J Philip Saul Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2008-05-19 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Kazuhiro Takahashi; Frank Cecchin; Elizabeth Fortescue; Charles I Berul; Mark E Alexander; Edward P Walsh; Francis Fynn-Thompson; John K Triedman Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 1.976