Vascular access for haemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: The recent expansion of renal replacement therapy programmes has been associated with an increase in the number and complexity of patients requiring permanent vascular access. The introduction of strategies designed to maximize secondary access patency is, therefore, increasingly important as a means of prolonging patient survival on dialysis, reducing morbidity and reducing the escalating cost of such programmes.
METHODS: A review of the current literature on the planning of vascular access, access surveillance methods and treatment of the most common complications was performed.
RESULTS: Multidisciplinary vascular access planning, increased use of preoperative imaging and the preferential use of autogeneous vein are essential to obtain the best long-term results. While vascular access surveillance, in particular protocols involving direct measurement of access flow, enables the prospective detection and treatment of venous stenosis, the precise indications for treating venous stenosis remain unclear. Surgical revision remains the gold standard for the treatment of failing arteriovenous fistulas, but recent advances in interventional radiological techniques along with the suitability of arteriovenous fistulas for percutaneous intervention may offer an effective alternative. The effect of both these interventions on access patency requires comparison in a randomized trial.
CONCLUSION: The introduction of strategies to improve access patency rates will change vascular access surgical practice away from the construction of new fistulas towards an increase in outpatient percutaneous intervention and surgical revisional procedures. The role of surgical interventions requires clearer definition.