Literature DB >> 11040144

A study of clinical opinion and practice regarding circumcision.

Z Farshi1, K R Atkinson, R Squire.   

Abstract

AIM: To establish clinical opinion regarding appropriate indications for circumcision and to examine actual clinical practice.
METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all NHS hospital consultants in the Yorkshire region of the UK identified as having a role to play in the management of boys (under 16 years of age) requiring circumcision. Retrospective data on actual clinical practice during a three month study period were also collected via a simple proforma.
RESULTS: Of 153 questionnaires sent, 64 were returned. Responses revealed varying opinions regarding appropriate indications for circumcision within each consultant group, and between paediatricians and surgeons. Surgeons were generally more inclined to recommend circumcision for each of the indications listed in the questionnaire. Analysis of clinical practice revealed that almost two thirds of procedures were carried out for phimosis, and nearly half of these children were under the age of 5 years.
CONCLUSION: There are differences in the clinical opinions of surgeons and paediatricians on what constitutes an appropriate indication for circumcision. Paediatricians' opinions are generally more in line with current evidence than those of surgeons, possibly resulting in many unnecessary circumcisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11040144      PMCID: PMC1718533          DOI: 10.1136/adc.83.5.393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  10 in total

Review 1.  Medical indications for circumcision.

Authors:  A M Rickwood
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  The fate of the foreskin, a study of circumcision.

Authors:  D GAIRDNER
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1949-12-24

Review 3.  The question of routine neonatal circumcision.

Authors:  R L Poland
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-05-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Is phimosis overdiagnosed in boys and are too many circumcisions performed in consequence?

Authors:  A M Rickwood; J Walker
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Further fate of the foreskin. Incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys.

Authors:  J Oster
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Why are children referred for circumcision?

Authors:  N Williams; J Chell; L Kapila
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-01-02

7.  Circumcision of children.

Authors:  J P Warren; P D Smith; J D Dalton; G R Edwards; M Foden; R Preston; P Stewart; A Roberts; P C Cookson; J Elliott; J S Phillips; J Williams; M Mallinson-Read; I Morris; J Bowring; R Warburton; J Blazeby; T Peters; J Moore; J Stevens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-02-10

8.  Effect of circumcision on incidence of urinary tract infection in preschool boys.

Authors:  J C Craig; J F Knight; P Sureshkumar; E Mantz; L P Roy
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Balanitis.

Authors:  J M Escala; A M Rickwood
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1989-02

Review 10.  Complications of circumcision.

Authors:  N Williams; L Kapila
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.939

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Trends and attitudes towards paediatric circumcision in the South of Ireland.

Authors:  F O'Kelly; D M Fanning; S Elamin; E Kiely; C M Brady
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 1.568

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.