PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of optic disc size on segmental neuroretinal rim area in healthy eyes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 193 eyes of 193 healthy patients with physiologic disc cupping. On 15 degrees color stereophotographic optic disc diapositives, optic disc area and neuroretinal rim area were morphometrically determined in 36 radial optic disc segments each measuring 10 degrees. RESULTS: The correlations of segmental rim area to disc area were significantly strongest (P < 0.01) and the regression lines were steepest in the inferior disc region, and the values were lowest in the temporal disc region. Complementary to the rim data, the correlations of segmental cup area to disc area were significantly strongest (P < 0.01) and the regression lines were steepest in the temporal disc region, and the values were lowest in the inferior disc region. In comparison with neuroretinal rim area, cup area was significantly (P < 0.01) more strongly correlated with disc area and the regression line was steeper in the whole optic disc and in each disc segment. The regional distribution of the widest rim part and smallest rim part was independent of disc size. CONCLUSIONS: The increase of rim area and cup area with increasing disc size differs between various disc regions. Because cup area increases more than rim area with increasing disc size, correction for disc size may be more important for segmental cup area than for segmental rim area. The rim shape with respect to the location of the smallest or broadest rim part is independent of disc size.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of optic disc size on segmental neuroretinal rim area in healthy eyes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 193 eyes of 193 healthy patients with physiologic disc cupping. On 15 degrees color stereophotographic optic disc diapositives, optic disc area and neuroretinal rim area were morphometrically determined in 36 radial optic disc segments each measuring 10 degrees. RESULTS: The correlations of segmental rim area to disc area were significantly strongest (P < 0.01) and the regression lines were steepest in the inferior disc region, and the values were lowest in the temporal disc region. Complementary to the rim data, the correlations of segmental cup area to disc area were significantly strongest (P < 0.01) and the regression lines were steepest in the temporal disc region, and the values were lowest in the inferior disc region. In comparison with neuroretinal rim area, cup area was significantly (P < 0.01) more strongly correlated with disc area and the regression line was steeper in the whole optic disc and in each disc segment. The regional distribution of the widest rim part and smallest rim part was independent of disc size. CONCLUSIONS: The increase of rim area and cup area with increasing disc size differs between various disc regions. Because cup area increases more than rim area with increasing disc size, correction for disc size may be more important for segmental cup area than for segmental rim area. The rim shape with respect to the location of the smallest or broadest rim part is independent of disc size.
Authors: M M Hermann; I Theofylaktopoulos; N Bangard; C Jonescu-Cuypers; S Coburger; M Diestelhorst Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Linda M Zangwill; Radha Ayyagari; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Robert Feldman; Harvey Dubiner; Keri A Dirkes; Matthew Holmann; Eunice Williams-Steppe; Naama Hammel; Luke J Saunders; Suzanne Vega; Kevin Sandow; Kathryn Roll; Rigby Slight; Daniel Auerbach; Brian C Samuels; Joseph F Panarelli; John P Mitchell; Lama A Al-Aswad; Sung Chul Park; Celso Tello; Jeremy Cotliar; Rajendra Bansal; Paul A Sidoti; George A Cioffi; Dana Blumberg; Robert Ritch; Nicholas P Bell; Lauren S Blieden; Garvin Davis; Felipe A Medeiros; Maggie C Y Ng; Swapan K Das; Nicholette D Palmer; Jasmin Divers; Carl D Langefeld; Barry I Freedman; Donald W Bowden; Mark A Christopher; Yii-der I Chen; Xiuqing Guo; Kent D Taylor; Jerome I Rotter; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Anthony P Khawaja; Michelle P Y Chan; David C Broadway; David F Garway-Heath; Robert Luben; Jennifer L Y Yip; Shabina Hayat; Kay-Tee Khaw; Paul J Foster Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Anthony P Khawaja; Michelle P Y Chan; David C Broadway; David F Garway-Heath; Robert Luben; Jennifer L Y Yip; Shabina Hayat; Kay-Tee Khaw; Paul J Foster Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-01-07 Impact factor: 4.799