Literature DB >> 11037567

Secondary prevention following fractured neck of femur: a survey of orthopaedic surgeons practice.

J Sheehan1, F Mohamed, M Reilly, I J Perry.   

Abstract

Fractured neck of femur is one of the most common reasons for hospital admission in the elderly population. Despite this little attention is given to the area of secondary prevention. To assess the variation in clinical practice among orthopaedic surgeons with regard to the use of secondary preventive measures in relation to fractured neck of femur. A postal survey using a self-completed questionnaire among all orthopaedic surgeons throughout the Republic of Ireland. The study questionnaire addressed unit information prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis and investigation and secondary prevention of fractured neck of femur. It gave a clinical scenario of a 72-year old female who was admitted with a fractured neck of femur after a minor fall. A reminder was sent to the non-responders. Data were analysed using chi-squared test. The number of completed questionnaires returned was 89 giving a response rate of 66%. Of these 71(82.6%) reported that they would not initiate or recommend investigation of the extent of the underlying osteoporosis in the specific case upon which the questionnaire was based. With regard to the issue of secondary prevention 16(18%) stated that they would prescribe Vitamin D and 26(29%) would prescribe calcium supplements. 15(17%) would use bisphosphonates and 15(17%) would prescribe hormone replacement therapy. Only one respondent would use an external hip protector. There is an underuse of secondary preventive measures with regard to fractured neck of femur. There needs to be clear definition of roles and perhaps the development of agreed local protocols in order that patients with hip fractures do not miss out on potentially beneficial treatment. There is an underuse of secondary preventive measures with regard to fractured neck of femur. There needs to be clear definition of roles and perhaps the development of agreed local protocols in order that patients with hip fractures do not miss out on potentially beneficial treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11037567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir Med J        ISSN: 0332-3102


  18 in total

1.  Testing and treatment for osteoporosis following hip fracture in an integrated U.S. healthcare delivery system.

Authors:  A Shibli-Rahhal; M S Vaughan-Sarrazin; K Richardson; P Cram
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Canadian orthopedic surgeons and postfracture osteoporosis care: moving from persuasion toward facilitation.

Authors:  Earl R Bogoch
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Two-year adherence to treatment and associated factors in a fracture liaison service in Spain.

Authors:  A Naranjo; S Ojeda-Bruno; A Bilbao-Cantarero; J C Quevedo-Abeledo; B V Diaz-González; C Rodríguez-Lozano
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Adherence of academic geriatric practitioners to osteoporosis screening guidelines.

Authors:  D N McNally; A M Kenny; J-A Smith
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Short time-frame from first to second hip fracture in the Funen County Hip Fracture Study.

Authors:  T Nymark; J M Lauritsen; O Ovesen; N D Röck; B Jeune
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Factors related to the use of bone densitometry: survey responses of 494 primary care physicians in New England.

Authors:  D H Solomon; M T Connelly; C J Rosen; B Dawson-Hughes; D P Kiel; S L Greenspan; E S Leib; M Holick; A H Miguel; J S Finkelstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: a systematic review.

Authors:  V Elliot-Gibson; E R Bogoch; S A Jamal; D E Beaton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Initiation of osteoporosis assessment in the fracture clinic results in improved osteoporosis management: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J M Queally; C Kiernan; M Shaikh; F Rowan; D Bennett
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to improve post-fracture investigation and management of patients at risk of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Little; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Effect of hospitalist consultation on treatment of osteoporosis in hip fracture patients.

Authors:  Carolyn M Jachna; Jeff Whittle; Barbara Lukert; Leland Graves; Tarun Bhargava
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.