Literature DB >> 11037282

Postural invariance in three-dimensional reaching and grasping movements.

H Gréa1, M Desmurget, C Prablanc.   

Abstract

The question of whether the final arm posture to be reached is determined in advance during prehension movements remains widely debated. To address this issue, we designed a psychophysical experiment in which human subjects were instructed to reach and grasp, with their right arm, a small sphere presented at various locations. In some trials the sphere remained stationary, while in others (the perturbed trials) it suddenly jumped, at movement onset, to a new unpredictable position. Our data indicate that the final configuration of the upper limb is highly predictable for a given location of the sphere. For movements directed at stationary objects, the variability of the final arm posture was very small in relation to the variability allowed by joint redundancy. For movements directed at "jumping" objects, the initial motor response was quickly amended, allowing an accurate grasp. The final arm posture reached at the end of the perturbed trials was neither different from nor more variable than the final arm posture reached at the end of the corresponding stationary trials (i.e. the trials sharing the same final object location). This latter result is not trivial, considering both joint redundancy and the motor reorganization imposed by the change in sphere location. In contrast to earlier observations, our data cannot be accounted for by biomechanical or functional factors. Indeed, the spherical object used in the present study did not constrain the final arm configuration or the hand trajectory. When considered together, our data support the idea that the final posture to be reached is planned in advance and used as a control variable by the central nervous system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11037282     DOI: 10.1007/s002210000427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Sequential control signals determine arm and trunk contributions to hand transport during reaching in humans.

Authors:  Elena Rossi; Arnold Mitnitski; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Effect of accuracy constraint on joint coordination during pointing movements.

Authors:  Ya-Weng Tseng; John P Scholz; Gregor Schöner; Lawrence Hotchkiss
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Posture-based or trajectory-based movement planning: a comparison of direct and indirect pointing movements.

Authors:  Frouke Hermens; Stan Gielen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Control of hand orientation and arm movement during reach and grasp.

Authors:  Jing Fan; Jiping He; Stephen I Helms Tillery
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Modeling 3D object manipulation: synchronous single-axis joint rotations?

Authors:  Mary D Klein Breteler; Ruud G J Meulenbroek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effect of motor planning on use of motor abundance.

Authors:  Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira de Freitas; John Peter Scholz; Andrea Janelle Stehman
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Motor equivalence and self-motion induced by different movement speeds.

Authors:  J P Scholz; T Dwight-Higgin; J E Lynch; Y W Tseng; V Martin; G Schöner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Functional reorganization of upper-body movement after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Maura Casadio; Assaf Pressman; Alon Fishbach; Zachary Danziger; Santiago Acosta; David Chen; Hsiang-Yi Tseng; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Unpredictable elbow joint perturbation during reaching results in multijoint motor equivalence.

Authors:  D J S Mattos; M L Latash; E Park; J Kuhl; J P Scholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Does hand dominance affect the use of motor abundance when reaching to uncertain targets?

Authors:  Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 2.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.