STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and patient tolerance, compliance, and preference between auto-continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and constant CPAP. DESIGN: Single-blinded, crossover, cohort study of consecutive patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, with two treatment periods of 2 months each. PATIENTS: Twenty-five patients (22 men, 3 women) with sleep apnea syndrome confirmed by ambulatory polysomnography. MEASUREMENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: After baseline polysomnography, patients underwent in-laboratory polysomnography for titration of constant CPAP. The order of treatment was randomly allocated, either auto-CPAP and then constant CPAP, or vice versa. The auto-CPAP pressure range was 6 to 16 cm H(2)O. At the end of each 2-month period, patients underwent a control ambulatory polysomnography and received a questionnaire on subjective well-being and device evaluation. Duration of use was checked through CPAP device monitoring. RESULTS: No differences were found in apnea/hypopnea index (constant CPAP, 9.7+/-1.9 events/h vs auto-CPAP, 10.6+/-9.3 events/h), awakening/arousal index (constant CPAP, 13.7 +/- 8.0 events/h vs auto-CPAP, 15.5 +/- 8.9 events/h), slow-wave sleep duration, nocturnal saturation, or complaint of daytime sleepiness. The mean pressure required was significantly lower during auto-CPAP than during constant CPAP (8.8+/-1.8 cm H(2)O vs. 9.7+/-2.6 cm H(2)O, respectively). Patient tolerance, compliance, and duration of use were similar with both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Auto-CPAP is as effective as constant CPAP. A wide pressure range for auto-CPAP can be used in all patients, suggesting that, in the future, use of a broad pressure range in the auto-CPAP mode could obviate the need for the titration night.
RCT Entities:
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and patient tolerance, compliance, and preference between auto-continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and constant CPAP. DESIGN: Single-blinded, crossover, cohort study of consecutive patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, with two treatment periods of 2 months each. PATIENTS: Twenty-five patients (22 men, 3 women) with sleep apnea syndrome confirmed by ambulatory polysomnography. MEASUREMENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: After baseline polysomnography, patients underwent in-laboratory polysomnography for titration of constant CPAP. The order of treatment was randomly allocated, either auto-CPAP and then constant CPAP, or vice versa. The auto-CPAP pressure range was 6 to 16 cm H(2)O. At the end of each 2-month period, patients underwent a control ambulatory polysomnography and received a questionnaire on subjective well-being and device evaluation. Duration of use was checked through CPAP device monitoring. RESULTS: No differences were found in apnea/hypopnea index (constant CPAP, 9.7+/-1.9 events/h vs auto-CPAP, 10.6+/-9.3 events/h), awakening/arousal index (constant CPAP, 13.7 +/- 8.0 events/h vs auto-CPAP, 15.5 +/- 8.9 events/h), slow-wave sleep duration, nocturnal saturation, or complaint of daytime sleepiness. The mean pressure required was significantly lower during auto-CPAP than during constant CPAP (8.8+/-1.8 cm H(2)O vs. 9.7+/-2.6 cm H(2)O, respectively). Patient tolerance, compliance, and duration of use were similar with both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Auto-CPAP is as effective as constant CPAP. A wide pressure range for auto-CPAP can be used in all patients, suggesting that, in the future, use of a broad pressure range in the auto-CPAP mode could obviate the need for the titration night.
Authors: Susheel P Patil; Indu A Ayappa; Sean M Caples; R Joh Kimoff; Sanjay R Patel; Christopher G Harrod Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Nikolaus C Netzer; János Juhász; Markus Hofmann; Kathrin Hohl; Kingman P Strohl; Thomas E A H Küpper Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Fitzgerald Drummond; Peter Doelken; Qanta A Ahmed; Gregory E Gilbert; Charlie Strange; Laura Herpel; Michael D Frye Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Wietske Richard; Jantine Venker; Cindy den Herder; Dennis Kox; Bob van den Berg; Martin Laman; Harm van Tinteren; Nico de Vries Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2007-04-19 Impact factor: 2.503