Literature DB >> 11034732

Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens on postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery.

H Jørgensen1, J Wetterslev, S Møiniche, J B Dahl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal paralysis, nausea and vomiting, and pain, are major clinical problems following abdominal surgery. Anaesthetic and analgesic techniques that reduce pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and prevent or reduce postoperative ileus, may reduce postoperative morbidity, duration of hospitalisation and hospital costs.
OBJECTIVES: To compare effects of postoperative epidural local anaesthetic with regimens based on systemic or epidural opioids, on postoperative gastrointestinal function, postoperative pain, PONV and surgical/anaesthetic complications. SEARCH STRATEGY: Trials were identified by computerised searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and by checking the reference lists of trials and review articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing the effects of postoperative epidural local anaesthetic with systemic or epidural opioids. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Collected data included treatment in active (local anaesthetic) and control (opioid based) groups, time to first postoperative stool, time to first postoperative flatus, gastric emptying measured by the paracetamol absorption test, duration of the passage of barium sulphate, pain assessments, use of supplementary analgesics, nausea, vomiting and surgical/anaesthetic complications. MAIN
RESULTS: Most studies in this review involved a small number of patients. Furthermore half of the studies indicated a poor level of methodology in particular regarding blinding and report of withdrawals. Heterogeneity of included studies was substantial. Results consistently showed reduced time to return of gastrointestinal function in the epidural local anaesthetic group compared with groups receiving systemic or epidural opioid (37 hours and 24 hours, respectively). Postoperative pain was comparable. Two studies compared the effect of epidural local anaesthetic with a combination of epidural local anaesthetic and opioid on gastrointestinal function. One study favoured epidural local anaesthetic and one study was indifferent. A meta analysis of five of eight studies comparing the effect of epidural local anaesthetic with a combination of epidural local anaesthetic and opioid on postoperative pain, yielded a reduction in VAS pain scores (0-100 mm) on the first postoperative day of 15 mm, in favour of the combination. No significant differences in PONV were observed between epidural local anaesthetic and opioid based regimens. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: Administration of epidural local anaesthetics to patients undergoing laparotomy reduce gastrointestinal paralysis compared with systemic or epidural opioids, with comparable postoperative pain relief. Addition of opioid to epidural local anaesthetic may provide superior postoperative analgesia compared with epidural local anaesthetics alone. The effect of additional epidural opioid on gastrointestinal function is so far unsettled. Randomized, controlled trials comparing the effect of combinations of epidural local anaesthetic and opioid with epidural local anaesthetic alone on postoperative gastrointestinal function and pain are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11034732     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  91 in total

Review 1.  Postoperative ileus: progress towards effective management.

Authors:  Kathrine Holte; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Effect of postoperative pain treatment on outcome-current status and future strategies.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-02-28       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Fast track colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Timothy C Counihan; Joanne Favuzza
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-02

4.  Continuous local analgesic therapy reduces pain after radical inguinal/iliacal lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Heiko Neuss; Martin Schomaker; Wieland Raue; Gerold Koplin; Oliver Haase
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  [The role of anesthesiology in fast track concepts in colonic surgery].

Authors:  M Hensel; W Schwenk; A Bloch; W Raue; S Stracke; T Volk; C von Heymann; J M Müller; W J Kox; C Spies
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  [Postoperative ileus. Pathophysiology and prevention].

Authors:  J Köninger; C N Gutt; M N Wente; H Friess; E Martin; M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  The opioid component of delayed gastrointestinal recovery after bowel resection.

Authors:  Timothy L Beard; John B Leslie; Jeffrey Nemeth
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Epidural analgesia diminished pain but did not otherwise improve enhanced recovery after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Pertti Turunen; Monika Carpelan-Holmström; Pekka Kairaluoma; Heidi Wikström; Olli Kruuna; Pertti Pere; Martina Bachmann; Seppo Sarna; Tom Scheinin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Low plasma albumin linked to fluid overload in postoperative epidural patients.

Authors:  Karan Malhotra; Benedict Axisa
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Combined lumbar spinal and thoracic high-epidural regional anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia for high-risk patients undergoing gastrointestinal and colorectal surgery.

Authors:  James Skipworth; Attavar Srilekha; Dimitri Raptis; David O'Callaghan; Siri Siriwardhana; Romi Navaratnam
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.