Literature DB >> 11034498

Classification of Proteus vulgaris biogroup 3 with recognition of Proteus hauseri sp. nov., nom. rev. and unnamed Proteus genomospecies 4, 5 and 6.

C M O'Hara, F W Brenner, A G Steigerwalt, B C Hill, B Holmes, P A Grimont, P M Hawkey, J L Penner, J M Miller, D J Brenner.   

Abstract

Strains traditionally identified as Proteus vulgaris formed three biogroups. Biogroup 1, characterized by negative reactions for indole production, salicin fermentation and aesculin hydrolysis, is now known as Proteus penneri. Biogroup 2, characterized by positive reactions for indole, salicin and aesculin, was shown by DNA hybridization (hydroxyapatite method) to be a genetic species separate from biogroup 1 and from biogroup 3 which is positive for indole production and negative for salicin and aesculin. In this study, 52 strains were examined, of which 36 strains were Proteus vulgaris biogroup 3, which included the current type strain of the species P. vulgaris (ATCC 29905T), and compared to seven strains of Proteus vulgaris biogroup 2 and nine type strains of other species in the genera Proteus, Providencia and Morganella. By DNA hybridization, these 36 strains were separated into four distinct groups, designated as Proteus genomospecies 3, 4, 5 and 6. DNAs within each separate Proteus genomospecies were 74-99% related to each other in 60 degrees C hybridization reactions with < or = 4.5% divergence between related sequences. Proteus genomospecies 3 contained the former P. vulgaris type strain and one other strain and was negative in reactions for salicin fermentation, aesculin hydrolysis and deoxyribonuclease, unlike the reactions associated with strains considered as typical P. vulgaris which are positive in reactions for salicin, aesculin and DNase. Genomospecies 3 can be distinguished from Proteus genomospecies 4, 5 and 6 because it is negative for Jordan's tartrate. Proteus genomospecies 4, containing five strains, was differentiated from Proteus penneri, genomospecies 3 and 6 and most, but not all, strains of genomospecies 5, by its ability to ferment L-rhamnose. Proteus genomospecies 5 and 6, containing 18 and 11 strains, respectively, could not be separated from each other by traditional biochemical tests, by carbon source utilization tests or SDS-PAGE of whole-cell proteins. In an earlier publication, a request was made to the Judicial Commission that the former type strain of P. vulgaris (ATCC 13315) be replaced by P. vulgaris biogroup 2 strain ATCC 29905T, a strain considered more biochemically typical of P. vulgaris strains. This would have the effect of assigning the name P. vulgaris to P. vulgaris biogroup 2. Since this request has been acceded to, the name Proteus hauseri is herein proposed for Proteus vulgaris genomospecies 3. Its type strain is ATCC 700826T. Proteus genomospecies 4, 5 and 6 will remain unnamed until better phenotypic differentiation can be accomplished. All Proteus genomospecies were similar in their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. Nineteen strains were isolated from urine, four from faeces, two from wounds, nine from other human sources and two from animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11034498     DOI: 10.1099/00207713-50-5-1869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol        ISSN: 1466-5026            Impact factor:   2.747


  16 in total

1.  Biochemical identification and characterization of DNA groups within the Proteus vulgaris complex.

Authors:  J M Janda; S L Abbott; S Khashe; W Probert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Classification, identification, and clinical significance of Proteus, Providencia, and Morganella.

Authors:  C M O'Hara; F W Brenner; J M Miller
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Molecular and genetic analyses of the putative Proteus O antigen gene locus.

Authors:  Quan Wang; Agnieszka Torzewska; Xiaojuan Ruan; Xiaoting Wang; Antoni Rozalski; Zhujun Shao; Xi Guo; Haijian Zhou; Lu Feng; Lei Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Proteus spp. as Putative Gastrointestinal Pathogens.

Authors:  Amy L Hamilton; Michael A Kamm; Siew C Ng; Mark Morrison
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Rapid detection of urinary tract infections caused by Proteus spp. using PNA-FISH.

Authors:  C Almeida; N F Azevedo; J C Bento; N Cerca; H Ramos; M J Vieira; C W Keevil
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 6.  Performance and Application of 16S rRNA Gene Cycle Sequencing for Routine Identification of Bacteria in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory.

Authors:  Deirdre L Church; Lorenzo Cerutti; Antoine Gürtler; Thomas Griener; Adrian Zelazny; Stefan Emler
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Serological and structural characterization of the O-antigens of the unclassified Proteus mirabilis strains TG 83, TG 319, and CCUG 10700 (OA).

Authors:  Agnieszka Zabłotni; Krystyna Zych; Anna N Kondakova; Małgorzata Siwińska; Yuriy A Knirel; Zygmunt Sidorczyk
Journal:  Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz)       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.291

8.  ECA-immunogenicity of Proteus mirabilis strains.

Authors:  Katarzyna Anna Duda; Katarzyna Teresa Duda; Agnieszka Beczała; Katarzyna Kasperkiewicz; Joanna Radziejewska-Lebrecht; Mikael Skurnik
Journal:  Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz)       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.291

9.  Serological classification and epitope specificity of Proteus vulgaris TG 251 from Proteus serogroup O65.

Authors:  Krystyna Zych; Katarzyna Kołodziejska; Dominika Drzewiecka; Andrey V Perepelov; Yuriy A Knirel; Zygmunt Sidorczyk
Journal:  Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz)       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 4.291

10.  Draft Genome Sequence of the Bioelectricity-Generating and Dye-Decolorizing Bacterium Proteus hauseri Strain ZMd44.

Authors:  Nan Wang; I-Son Ng; Po Ting Chen; Yuzhe Li; Yi-Chung Chen; Bor-Yann Chen; Yinghua Lu
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2014-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.