Literature DB >> 16049304

Identification and characterization of optimal gene expression markers for detection of breast cancer metastasis.

John Backus1, Todd Laughlin, Yixin Wang, Robert Belly, Robert White, Jon Baden, C Justus Min, Ann Mannie, Lorraine Tafra, David Atkins, Kathryn M Verbanac.   

Abstract

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) status is highly predictive of overall axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer. Historically, SLN-positive patients have undergone axillary lymph node dissection in a second surgery. Intraoperative SLN analysis could reduce the cost and complications of a second surgery; however, existing histopathological methods lack standardization and exhibit poor sensitivity. Rapid molecular methods may lead to improved intraoperative diagnosis of SLN metastasis. In this study, we used a genome-wide gene expression analysis of breast and other tissues to identify seven putative markers for detecting breast cancer metastasis. We assessed the utility of these markers for identifying clinically actionable metastases in lymph nodes through reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis of SLNs from 254 breast cancer patients. Polymerase chain reaction signals were compared to pathology on a per-patient basis. The optimal two-gene combination, mammaglobin and cytokeratin 19, detected clinically actionable metastasis in breast SLNs with 90% sensitivity and 94% specificity. Application of stringent criteria for identifying presumptive hematoxylin- and eosin-positive samples increased sensitivity and specificity to 91 and 97%, respectively. This study represents the first comprehensive demonstration of the utility of gene expression markers for detecting clinically actionable breast metastases. An intraoperative molecular assay using these markers has the potential to significantly reduce second surgeries for patients undergoing SLN dissection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16049304      PMCID: PMC1867547          DOI: 10.1016/s1525-1578(10)60561-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  37 in total

1.  Real-time quantitative RT-PCR after laser-assisted cell picking.

Authors:  L Fink; W Seeger; L Ermert; J Hänze; U Stahl; F Grimminger; W Kummer; R M Bohle
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Intraoperative examination of the sentinel lymph node for breast carcinoma staging.

Authors:  R R Turner; N M Hansen; S L Stern; A E Giuliano
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Mammaglobin expression in primary, metastatic, and occult breast cancer.

Authors:  M A Watson; S Dintzis; C M Darrow; L E Voss; J DiPersio; R Jensen; T P Fleming
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Reliability of intraoperative frozen section and imprint cytological investigation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.

Authors:  P J Van Diest; H Torrenga; P J Borgstein; R Pijpers; R P Bleichrodt; F D Rahusen; S Meijer
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Quantitative polymerase chain reaction for the detection of micrometastases in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  M J Slade; B M Smith; H D Sinnett; N C Cross; R C Coombes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Role of immunohistochemical detection of lymph-node metastases in management of breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  R J Cote; H F Peterson; B Chaiwun; R D Gelber; A Goldhirsch; M Castiglione-Gertsch; B Gusterson; A M Neville
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-09-11       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Limitations of specific reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction markers in the detection of metastases in the lymph nodes and blood of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  P J Bostick; S Chatterjee; D D Chi; K T Huynh; A E Giuliano; R Cote; D S Hoon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Identification of superior markers for polymerase chain reaction detection of breast cancer metastases in sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  C J Min; L Tafra; K M Verbanac
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Detection of occult breast cancer micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes using a multimarker reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction panel.

Authors:  M A Lockett; P L Baron; P H O'Brien; B M Elliott; J G Robison; N Maitre; J S Metcalf; D J Cole
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Analysis of potential markers for detection of submicroscopic lymph node metastases in breast cancer.

Authors:  A E Merrie; K Yun; J Gunn; L V Phillips; J L McCall
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  10 in total

1.  Multi-modality morphological correlation of axillary lymph nodes.

Authors:  Lina Arbash Meinel; Hiroyuki Abe; Martin Bergtholdt; Jacob Ecanow; Robert Schmidt; Gillian Newstead
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Proteomic signatures of acquired letrozole resistance in breast cancer: suppressed estrogen signaling and increased cell motility and invasiveness.

Authors:  Syreeta L Tilghman; Ian Townley; Qiu Zhong; Patrick P Carriere; Jin Zou; Shawn D Llopis; Lynez C Preyan; Christopher C Williams; Elena Skripnikova; Melyssa R Bratton; Qiang Zhang; Guangdi Wang
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  A quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay to identify metastatic carcinoma tissue of origin.

Authors:  Dimitri Talantov; Jonathan Baden; Tim Jatkoe; Kristina Hahn; Jack Yu; Yashoda Rajpurohit; Yiqiu Jiang; Chang Choi; Jeffrey S Ross; David Atkins; Yixin Wang; Abhijit Mazumder
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  A mammaglobin-A targeting agent for noninvasive detection of breast cancer metastasis in lymph nodes.

Authors:  Narges K Tafreshi; Steven A Enkemann; Marilyn M Bui; Mark C Lloyd; Dominique Abrahams; Amanda S Huynh; Jongphil Kim; Stephen R Grobmyer; W Bradford Carter; Josef Vagner; Robert J Gillies; David L Morse
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Analysis of molecular markers as predictive factors of lymph node involvement in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Luciana Marques Paula; Luis Henrique Ferreira De Moraes; Abaeté Leite Do Canto; Laurita Dos Santos; Airton Abrahão Martin; Silvia Regina Rogatto; Renata De Azevedo Canevari
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  GABA(A) receptor pi (GABRP) stimulates basal-like breast cancer cell migration through activation of extracellular-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2).

Authors:  Gina M Sizemore; Steven T Sizemore; Darcie D Seachrist; Ruth A Keri
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  CancerEST: a web-based tool for automatic meta-analysis of public EST data.

Authors:  Julia Feichtinger; Ramsay J McFarlane; Lee D Larcombe
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Detection of mammagloblin by RT-PCR as a biomarker for lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ana Monsalve-Lancheros; Milcíades Ibáñez-Pinilla; Sandra Ramírez-Clavijo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The Emerging Roles of π Subunit-Containing GABAA Receptors in Different Cancers.

Authors:  Iman Imtiyaz Ahmed Juvale; Zurina Hassan; Ahmad Tarmizi Che Has
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Visualisation of sentinel lymph node with indium-based near infrared emitting Quantum Dots in a murine metastatic breast cancer model.

Authors:  Marion Helle; Elsa Cassette; Lina Bezdetnaya; Thomas Pons; Agnès Leroux; François Plénat; François Guillemin; Benoît Dubertret; Frédéric Marchal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.