OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether there are independent effects of extracellular fluid volume (ECF) and fat mass (FM) on resting energy expenditure (REE) relative to fat-free mass (FFM) in adult men and women. METHODS: Multiple linear regression analysis was used to relate REE, as determined by indirect calorimetry, to FFM and FM (measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) and ECF (measured using bromide space and/or the radiosulfate washout space) in 153 women and 100 men with varying amounts of body fat. RESULTS: REE correlated significantly with FFM and FM in women (r=0.65 and r=0.63, both P<0.001) and men (r=0.62 and r=0.48, both P<0.001, FFM and FM, respectively). In a multiple linear regression analysis FFM, FM and age significantly contributed to the ability to predict REE in both genders. The models that were derived were not significantly different between women and men. In women the contribution to REE from FM was easier to detect when FM was greater. Adjustment of FFM for ECF did not improve the relationship between FFM and REE. CONCLUSIONS: FFM, FM and age are significant, independent predictors of REE in both men and women. Adjustment of FFM for ECF does not improve the ability of FFM to predict REE, which suggests that ECF is a highly integrated component of FFM in healthy adults. Expressing REE relative to FFM alone will introduce errors when lean and obese populations are compared.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether there are independent effects of extracellular fluid volume (ECF) and fat mass (FM) on resting energy expenditure (REE) relative to fat-free mass (FFM) in adult men and women. METHODS: Multiple linear regression analysis was used to relate REE, as determined by indirect calorimetry, to FFM and FM (measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) and ECF (measured using bromide space and/or the radiosulfate washout space) in 153 women and 100 men with varying amounts of body fat. RESULTS: REE correlated significantly with FFM and FM in women (r=0.65 and r=0.63, both P<0.001) and men (r=0.62 and r=0.48, both P<0.001, FFM and FM, respectively). In a multiple linear regression analysis FFM, FM and age significantly contributed to the ability to predict REE in both genders. The models that were derived were not significantly different between women and men. In women the contribution to REE from FM was easier to detect when FM was greater. Adjustment of FFM for ECF did not improve the relationship between FFM and REE. CONCLUSIONS: FFM, FM and age are significant, independent predictors of REE in both men and women. Adjustment of FFM for ECF does not improve the ability of FFM to predict REE, which suggests that ECF is a highly integrated component of FFM in healthy adults. Expressing REE relative to FFM alone will introduce errors when lean and obese populations are compared.
Authors: Analiza M Silva; Diana A Santos; Catarina N Matias; Paulo M Rocha; Edio L Petroski; Cláudia S Minderico; Luís B Sardinha Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2011-11-24 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Natalie S Hauser; Irini Manoli; Jennifer C Graf; Jennifer Sloan; Charles P Venditti Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: E K Berggren; P O'Tierney-Ginn; S Lewis; L Presley; S Hauguel De-Mouzon; P M Catalano Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-06-17 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Mads J Skytte; Amirsalar Samkani; Amy D Petersen; Mads N Thomsen; Arne Astrup; Elizaveta Chabanova; Jan Frystyk; Jens J Holst; Henrik S Thomsen; Sten Madsbad; Thomas M Larsen; Steen B Haugaard; Thure Krarup Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Asier Mañas; Ignacio Ara; Javier Leal-Martín; Miguel Muñoz-Muñoz; Sarah Kozey Keadle; Francisco Amaro-Gahete; Luis M Alegre Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-08-21 Impact factor: 11.928
Authors: S B Heymsfield; C M Peterson; B Bourgeois; D M Thomas; D Gallagher; B Strauss; M J Müller; A Bosy-Westphal Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Isabella P Carneiro; Sarah A Elliott; Mario Siervo; Raj Padwal; Simona Bertoli; Alberto Battezzati; Carla M Prado Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 8.701