Literature DB >> 11029270

Incorporating model uncertainties along with data uncertainties in microbial risk assessment.

S H Kang1, R L Kodell, J J Chen.   

Abstract

Much research on food safety has been conducted since the National Food Safety Initiative of 1997. Risk assessment plays an important role in food safety practices and programs, and various dose-response models for estimating microbial risks have been investigated. Several dose-response models can provide reasonably good fits to the data in the experimental dose range, but yield risk estimates that differ by orders of magnitude in the low-dose range. Hence, model uncertainty can be just important as data uncertainty (experimental variation) in risk assessment. Although it is common in risk assessment to account for data uncertainty, it is uncommon to account for model uncertainties. In this paper we incorporate data uncertainties with confidence limits and model uncertainties with a weighted average of an estimate from each of various models. A numerical tool to compute the maximum likelihood estimates and confidence limits is addressed. The proposed method for incorporating model uncertainties is illustrated with real data sets. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11029270     DOI: 10.1006/rtph.2000.1404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  9 in total

1.  The Impact of Model Uncertainty on Benchmark Dose Estimation.

Authors:  R Webster West; Walter W Piegorsch; Edsel A Peña; Lingling An; Wensong Wu; Alissa A Wickens; Hui Xiong; Wenhai Chen
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Benchmark Dose Analysis via Nonparametric Regression Modeling.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Hui Xiong; Rabi N Bhattacharya; Lizhen Lin
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Nonparametric estimation of benchmark doses in environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Hui Xiong; Rabi N Bhattacharya; Lizhen Lin
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Information-theoretic model-averaged benchmark dose analysis in environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch; Lingling An; Alissa A Wickens; R Webster West; Edsel A Peña; Wensong Wu
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Dose-Response Analysis Using R.

Authors:  Christian Ritz; Florent Baty; Jens C Streibig; Daniel Gerhard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Model Averaging with AIC Weights for Hypothesis Testing of Hormesis at Low Doses.

Authors:  Steven B Kim; Nathan Sanders
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  bmd: an R package for benchmark dose estimation.

Authors:  Signe M Jensen; Felix M Kluxen; Jens C Streibig; Nina Cedergreen; Christian Ritz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Historical Context and Recent Advances in Exposure-Response Estimation for Deriving Occupational Exposure Limits.

Authors:  M W Wheeler; R M Park; A J Bailer; C Whittaker
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Simulation-based assessment of model selection criteria during the application of benchmark dose method to quantal response data.

Authors:  Keita Yoshii; Hiroshi Nishiura; Kaoru Inoue; Takayuki Yamaguchi; Akihiko Hirose
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.432

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.