Literature DB >> 11028944

Effects of pH and dose on nasal absorption of scopolamine hydrobromide in human subjects.

S Ahmed1, A P Sileno, J C deMeireles, R Dua, H K Pimplaskar, W J Xia, J Marinaro, E Langenback, F J Matos, L Putcha, V D Romeo, C R Behl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of formulation pH and dose on nasal absorption of scopolamine hydrobromide, the single most effective drug available for the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by motion sickness.
METHODS: Human subjects received scopolamine nasally at a dose of 0.2 mg/0.05 mL or 0.4 mg/0.10 mL, blood samples were collected at different time points, and plasma scopolamine concentrations were determined by LC-MS/MS.
RESULTS: Following administration of a 0.2 mg dose, the average Cmax values were found to be 262+/-118, 419+/-161, and 488+/-331 pg/ mL for pH 4.0, 7.0, and 9.0 formulations, respectively. At the 0.4 mg dose the average Cmax values were found to be 503+/-199, 933+/-449, and 1,308+/-473 pg/mL for pH 4.0, 7.0, and 9.0 formulations, respectively. At a 0.2 mg dose, the AUC values were found to be 23,208+/-6,824, 29,145+/-9,225, and 25,721+/-5,294 pg x min/mL for formulation pH 4.0, 7.0, and 9.0, respectively. At a 0.4 mg dose, the average AUC value was found to be high for pH 9.0 formulation (70,740+/-29,381 pg x min/mL) as compared to those of pH 4.0 (59,573+/-13,700 pg x min/mL) and pH 7.0 (55,298+/-17,305 pg x min/mL) formulations. Both the Cmax and AUC values were almost doubled with doubling the dose. On the other hand, the average Tmax, values decreased linearly with a decrease in formulation pH at both doses. For example, at a 0.4 mg dose, the average Tmax values were 26.7+/-5.8, 15.0+/-10.0, and 8.8+/-2.5 minutes at formulation pH 4.0, 7.0, and 9.0, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Nasal absorption of scopolamine hydrobromide in human subjects increased substantially with increases in formulation pH and dose.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Center JSC; NASA Discipline Regulatory Physiology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11028944     DOI: 10.1023/a:1007551927177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  13 in total

1.  Prevention and treatment of motion sickness by intranasal medication.

Authors:  H I CHINN; R W HYDE; L J MILCH
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1955-12

2.  Absorption from the nasal mucous membrane.

Authors:  R W HYDE; J TONNDORF; H I CHINN
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1953-12       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Absorption from nasal mucous membrane: systemic effect of hyoscine following intranasal administration.

Authors:  J TONNDORF; R W HYDE; H I CHINN; J E LETT
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1953-09       Impact factor: 1.547

4.  Nasal absorption of insulin in dogs.

Authors:  S Harai; T Ikenaga; T Matsuzawa
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 9.461

5.  Prevention and treatment of space sickness in shuttle-orbiter missions.

Authors:  A Graybiel
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1979-02

6.  Pharmacokinetics and oral bioavailability of scopolamine in normal subjects.

Authors:  L Putcha; N M Cintrón; J Tsui; J M Vanderploeg; W G Kramer
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  A sensitive radioreceptor assay for determining scopolamine concentrations in plasma and urine.

Authors:  N M Cintrón; Y M Chen
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 8.  Intranasal drug delivery for systemic medications.

Authors:  Y W Chien; S F Chang
Journal:  Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.889

9.  Effects of dose, pH, and osmolarity on nasal absorption of secretin in rats.

Authors:  T Ohwaki; H Ando; S Watanabe; Y Miyake
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.534

10.  Effects of a dosing solution on the nasal absorption of non-glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in rats.

Authors:  H Nomura; S Akamisaka; K Maruyama
Journal:  Biol Pharm Bull       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.233

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Nasal vaccine as a booster shot: a viable solution to restrict pandemic?

Authors:  Sarasa Meenakshi; V Udaya Kumar; Sameer Dhingra; Krishna Murti
Journal:  Clin Exp Vaccine Res       Date:  2022-05-31

Review 2.  Intranasal administration of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.

Authors:  Henry R Costantino; Alexis Kays Leonard; Gordon Brandt; Paul H Johnson; Steven C Quay
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 3.288

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.