Literature DB >> 11027936

Physician gender and cesarean sections.

L K Mitler1, J A Rizzo, S M Horwitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among consumers insurers, and providers there is pervasive concern regarding the high incidence of cesarean section delivery. To date, attempts to reduce these rates have focused on the clinical behavior of providers resulting in only minimal changes. Therefore, non-medical variables must be investigated as potential explanatory factors for the decision to perform cesarean delivery.
METHODS: Data were collected on clinical and non-clinical factors for obstetrician-gynecologists delivering at Yale-New Haven Medical Center to measure the impact of these factors on the performance of cesarean sections. Specifically, variation in patient demographic, ante- and intra-partum risk variables, practice setting, and doctor-specific characteristics were examined. Using contingency table and logistic regression analyses the contribution of selected factors was evaluated.
RESULTS: Multivariate modeling revealed that male physicians were significantly more likely than their female colleagues to perform cesarean section. This relationship was particularly strong in the university practice setting.
CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to reduce the incidence of cesarean section need to focus on the continuing education of health care providers and the delineation of non-clinical factors as essential elements in the election of specific clinical therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11027936     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00221-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  9 in total

1.  Impact of a cultural belief about ghost month on delivery mode in Taiwan.

Authors:  Herng-Ching Lin; Sudha Xirasagar; Yu-Chi Tung
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Association of Obstetrician Gender With Obstetric Interventions and Outcomes.

Authors:  Lynn M Yee; Emily S Miller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Cultural implications of differing rates of medically indicated and elective cesarean deliveries for foreign-born versus native-born taiwanese mothers.

Authors:  Chun-Che Huang; Chung-Yi Li; Chiang-Hsing Yang
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-07

4.  Cesarean delivery among nulliparous women in Beirut: assessing predictors in nine hospitals.

Authors:  Hala Tamim; Souheil Y El-Chemaly; Anwar H Nassar; Alia M Aaraj; Oona M R Campbell; Afamia A Kaddour; Khalid A Yunis
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.689

5.  Is generalized maternal optimism or pessimism during pregnancy associated with unplanned cesarean section deliveries in China?

Authors:  Cheryl A Moyer; Yasmin Elsayed; Yuchun Zhu; Yumei Wei; Cyril M Engmann; Huixia Yang
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2011-01-05

6.  Do provider birth attitudes influence cesarean delivery rate: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Emily White VanGompel; Elliott K Main; Daniel Tancredi; Joy Melnikow
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Medina Braha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; David C Goodman; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Mode of Delivery among HIV-Infected Pregnant Women in Philadelphia, 2005-2013.

Authors:  Dana R Thompson; Florence M Momplaisir; Joëlla W Adams; Baligh R Yehia; Emily A Anderson; Gregg Alleyne; Kathleen A Brady
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cesarean delivery rate and staffing levels of the maternity unit.

Authors:  Saad Zbiri; Patrick Rozenberg; François Goffinet; Carine Milcent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.