OBJECTIVES: To study the association between occupational factors specific to the Armed Forces (rank, functional roles, Service, regular or reservist status and deployment factors) and symptomatic health problems in Gulf veterans, after sociodemographic and lifestyle factors have been accounted for. DESIGN: A postal cross sectional survey of randomly selected UK Gulf veterans was conducted six to seven years after the Gulf conflict. Physical ill health was measured using the Fatigue Questionnaire and a measure of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) multi-symptom syndrome. Psychological ill health was measured using the General Health Questionnaire and a post-traumatic stress measure. SETTING: Population of servicemen who were serving in the UK Armed Forces during the Gulf conflict between 1 September 1990 and 30 June 1991. PARTICIPANTS: 3297 Gulf veterans. MAIN RESULTS: In multivariate logistic regression, there was an inverse relation between higher rank and psychological and physical ill health (test of trend: General Health Questionnaire, p=0.004; post-traumatic stress, p=0.002; fatigue, p=0.015; CDC case, p=0.002). Having left the Armed Forces was associated with a two to three times increase in reporting ill health. Of the deployment factors, there was a weak association between being deployed as an individual reinforcement in a combat role and post-traumatic stress but there was no association between receiving pre-deployment training or post-deployment leave and ill health. Marital status and smoking were associated with psychological and physical ill health. CONCLUSIONS: Rank was the main occupational factor associated with both psychological and physical ill health in Gulf veterans. This may parallel the associations between socioeconomic status and morbidity in civilian populations. Ill health seems to be greater in those who return to civilian life. Sociodemographic factors also seem to be important in ill health in Gulf veterans.
OBJECTIVES: To study the association between occupational factors specific to the Armed Forces (rank, functional roles, Service, regular or reservist status and deployment factors) and symptomatic health problems in Gulf veterans, after sociodemographic and lifestyle factors have been accounted for. DESIGN: A postal cross sectional survey of randomly selected UK Gulf veterans was conducted six to seven years after the Gulf conflict. Physical ill health was measured using the Fatigue Questionnaire and a measure of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) multi-symptom syndrome. Psychological ill health was measured using the General Health Questionnaire and a post-traumatic stress measure. SETTING: Population of servicemen who were serving in the UK Armed Forces during the Gulf conflict between 1 September 1990 and 30 June 1991. PARTICIPANTS: 3297 Gulf veterans. MAIN RESULTS: In multivariate logistic regression, there was an inverse relation between higher rank and psychological and physical ill health (test of trend: General Health Questionnaire, p=0.004; post-traumatic stress, p=0.002; fatigue, p=0.015; CDC case, p=0.002). Having left the Armed Forces was associated with a two to three times increase in reporting ill health. Of the deployment factors, there was a weak association between being deployed as an individual reinforcement in a combat role and post-traumatic stress but there was no association between receiving pre-deployment training or post-deployment leave and ill health. Marital status and smoking were associated with psychological and physical ill health. CONCLUSIONS: Rank was the main occupational factor associated with both psychological and physical ill health in Gulf veterans. This may parallel the associations between socioeconomic status and morbidity in civilian populations. Ill health seems to be greater in those who return to civilian life. Sociodemographic factors also seem to be important in ill health in Gulf veterans.
Authors: L J Dlugosz; W J Hocter; K S Kaiser; J D Knoke; J M Heller; N A Hamid; R J Reed; K S Kendler; G C Gray Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: C Unwin; N Blatchley; W Coker; S Ferry; M Hotopf; L Hull; K Ismail; I Palmer; A David; S Wessely Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-01-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Anna Skowera; Matthew Hotopf; Elzbieta Sawicka; Ruben Varela-Calvino; Catherine Unwin; Vasilis Nikolaou; Lisa Hull; Khalida Ismail; Anthony S David; Simon C Wessely; Mark Peakman Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 8.317
Authors: H L Kelsall; M R Sim; A B Forbes; D C Glass; D P McKenzie; J F Ikin; M J Abramson; L Blizzard; P Ittak Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Dean P McKenzie; Mark Creamer; Helen L Kelsall; Andrew B Forbes; Jillian F Ikin; Malcolm R Sim; Alexander C McFarlane Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2009-09-10 Impact factor: 4.328