Literature DB >> 11027127

User satisfaction with teleconsultations for surgery.

P Aarnio1, H Rudenberg, M Ellonen, P Jaatinen.   

Abstract

We carried out a prospective study of realtime videoconferencing in surgical consultations. Videoconferencing equipment at the Satakunta Central Hospital, Pori, was connected by ISDN at 384 kbit/s to two health centres in the cities of Kankaanpää and Huittinen (55 and 60 km from Pori, respectively). A document camera was used to transmit images of radiographs and paper documents. Fifty patients who needed a surgical consultation were examined by a doctor in the health centres, and the surgeon interviewed and observed the physical examination by videoconference. The consultation time ranged from 12 to 23 min (mean 15 min). Technically the equipment functioned reliably and the quality of the video-picture was good. According to the consulting surgeon, the decision made in the videoconference was reliable in 48 cases (96%). According to the doctors in the health centres, the consultation was useful in 49 cases (98%) and was considered satisfactory in one. The doctors thought that the teleconsultation was as reliable as an outpatient appointment in 49 cases (98%). The educational benefit of the consultation was excellent or good in 38 cases (76%). The overall satisfaction of patients was very good or good in 45 cases (96%). All patients, except one, avoided travelling to a face-to-face appointment because they received a definite treatment decision during the teleconsultation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11027127     DOI: 10.1258/1357633001935301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  8 in total

1.  A tele-ultrasonographic platform to collect specialist second opinion in less specialized hospitals.

Authors:  Marina Carbone; Vincenzo Ferrari; Michele Marconi; Roberta Piazza; Andrea Del Corso; Daniele Adami; Quintilia Lucchesi; Valeria Pagni; Raffaella Berchiolli
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-08-18

2.  A comparison of patient satisfaction with telehealth and on-site consultations: a pilot study for prenatal genetic counseling.

Authors:  Debra J Abrams; Mark R Geier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  How effective is video consultation in clinical oncology? A systematic review.

Authors:  C Kitamura; L Zurawel-Balaura; R K S Wong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Evaluating the Effectiveness, Efficiency and Safety of Telemedicine for Urological Care in the Male Prisoner Population.

Authors:  Brenton G Sherwood; Yu Han; Kenneth G Nepple; Bradley A Erickson
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2017-01-08

5.  Environmental aspects of health care in the Grampian NHS region and the place of telehealth.

Authors:  Richard Wootton; Alex Tait; Amanda Croft
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.184

6.  Quality of care for remote orthopaedic consultations using telemedicine: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Astrid Buvik; Einar Bugge; Gunnar Knutsen; Arvid Småbrekke; Tom Wilsgaard
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Augmented Reality as a Telemedicine Platform for Remote Procedural Training.

Authors:  Shiyao Wang; Michael Parsons; Jordan Stone-McLean; Peter Rogers; Sarah Boyd; Kristopher Hoover; Oscar Meruvia-Pastor; Minglun Gong; Andrew Smith
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  Communication, collaboration and contagion: "Virtualisation" of anatomy during COVID-19.

Authors:  Kevin G Byrnes; Patrick A Kiely; Colum P Dunne; Kieran W McDermott; John Calvin Coffey
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.409

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.