Literature DB >> 20567623

How effective is video consultation in clinical oncology? A systematic review.

C Kitamura1, L Zurawel-Balaura, R K S Wong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Video-consultation (VC) is a specialized type of telemedicine that uses technology to provide real-time visual and audio patient assessment at a distance. In the present review, we set out to evaluate whether vc is feasible for the assessment, monitoring, and management of oncology patients.
METHODS: A search strategy designed to capture studies that addressed the use of telemedicine to deliver cancer care identified relevant articles in the medline (1966 to September 2008) and PubMed (to 2008) databases. Articles were included if they described studies incorporating video-conferencing between patient and provider for assessment or monitoring,physicians or nurses as the care providers,cancer patients,consultation in real-time, and reporting of 1 or more outcomes.
RESULTS: Of the more than three hundred articles retrieved, nineteen articles describing 15 unique patient populations involving 709 patients were inclusded in the analysis. No randomized trials were located. Eight studies included a control group; seven involved a case series. The most commonly reported outcomes were patient satisfaction (ten studies), cost to perform consultation (six studies), patient preference for vc compared with in-person consultation (five studies), provider satisfaction (four studies), and provider convenience (four studies). Of these outcomes, satisfaction on the part of patients and physicians has been positive overall, total costs were comparable to or less than those for in-person consultations, and patients valued having vc as an option for consultation. Outcomes evaluating the effect on clinical care were infrequently reported.
CONCLUSIONS: While there is evidence to suggest that vc is both feasible and effective for use in the clinical care of oncology patients, studies are generally small and methodologically weak, with limited power of inference.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Telemedicine; remote consultation; teleconsultation; video consultation

Year:  2010        PMID: 20567623      PMCID: PMC2880899          DOI: 10.3747/co.v17i3.513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  45 in total

1.  A cost analysis of a tele-oncology practice in the United States.

Authors:  Gary C Doolittle; Arthur R Williams; Ashley Spaulding; Ryan J Spaulding; David J Cook
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.184

2.  Construction of a remote radiotherapy planning system.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Ogawa; Kenji Nemoto; Yoshihisa Kakuto; Hiromasa Seiji; Kazuya Sasaki; Chiaki Takahashi; Yoshihiro Takai; Shogo Yamada
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Can subspecialty cancer consultations be delivered to communities using modern technology?--A pilot study.

Authors:  Brian Weinerman; Johanna den Duyf; Anne Hughes; Sarah Robertson
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.536

4.  A cost analysis of participation via personal attendance versus telemedicine at a head and neck oncology multidisciplinary team meeting.

Authors:  Joacim Stalfors; Ingela Björholt; Thomas Westin
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.184

5.  An assessment of the efficacy of cancer genetic counselling using real-time videoconferencing technology (telemedicine) compared to face-to-face consultations.

Authors:  Jordanna Joaquina Coelho; Angela Arnold; Jeremy Nayler; Marc Tischkowitz; James MacKay
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care: preliminary psychometric analysis in an oncology institute in Italy.

Authors:  A Brédart; D Razavi; C Robertson; F Didier; E Scaffidi; J C de Haes
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Telemedicine in radiotherapy: a study exploring remote treatment planning, supervision and economics.

Authors:  Jan Norum; Øyvind S Bruland; Oddvar Spanne; Trine Bergmo; Tor Green; Dag R Olsen; Jan H Olsen; Elisabeth E Sjåeng; Tatiana Burkow
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.184

8.  Psychometric refinement of an outpatient, visit-specific satisfaction with doctor questionnaire.

Authors:  D Andrew Loblaw; Andrea Bezjak; P Mony Singh; Andrew Gotowiec; David Joubert; Kenneth Mah; Gerald M Devins
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Traditional versus telenursing outpatient management of patients with cancer with new ostomies.

Authors:  Susan Kay Bohnenkamp; Pat McDonald; Ana Maria Lopez; Elizabeth Krupinski; Ann Blackett
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Validation of the EORTC QLQ-SAT32 cancer inpatient satisfaction questionnaire by self- versus interview-assessment comparison.

Authors:  A Brédart; V Mignot; A Rousseau; S Dolbeault; N Beauloye; V Adam; C Elie; I Léonard; B Asselain; T Conroy
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-08
View more
  34 in total

1.  Bridging the distance: a prospective tele-oncology study in Northern Norway.

Authors:  Tom Donnem; Bente Ervik; Kathrine Magnussen; Sigve Andersen; Doris Pastow; Sissel Andreassen; Tone Nørstad; Nina Helbekkmo; Roy M Bremnes; Tone Nordoy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Virtual small groups for weight management: an innovative delivery mechanism for evidence-based lifestyle interventions among obese men.

Authors:  Kristen M J Azar; Magi Aurora; Elsie J Wang; Amy Muzaffar; Alice Pressman; Latha P Palaniappan
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  The Role of Telemedicine in Providing Thoracic Oncology Care to Remote Areas of British Columbia.

Authors:  Michael F Humer; Barbara G Campling
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Improving access to specialist multidisciplinary palliative care consultation for rural cancer patients by videoconferencing: report of a pilot project.

Authors:  Sharon M Watanabe; Alysa Fairchild; Edith Pituskin; Patricia Borgersen; John Hanson; Konrad Fassbender
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  A qualitative study of patients' attitudes towards telemedicine for gynecologic cancer care.

Authors:  Evan J Kraus; Brittany Nicosia; David I Shalowitz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  Future of Teleoncology: Trends and Disparities in Telehealth and Secure Message Utilization in the COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Elad Neeman; Liisa Lyon; Hongxin Sun; Carol Conell; Mary Reed; Deepika Kumar; Tatjana Kolevska; Dinesh Kotak; Tilak Sundaresan; Raymond Liu
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2022-03

7.  Virtual visits among gynecologic oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic are accessible across the social vulnerability spectrum.

Authors:  Lindsey A McAlarnen; Shirng-Wern Tsaih; Rana Aliani; Natasha M Simske; Elizabeth E Hopp
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Study protocol: optimization of complex palliative care at home via telemedicine. A cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Froukje Duursma; Henk J Schers; Kris Cp Vissers; Jeroen Hasselaar
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 3.234

9.  Are multidisciplinary teams in secondary care cost-effective? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  K Melissa Ke; Jane M Blazeby; Sean Strong; Fran E Carroll; Andy R Ness; William Hollingworth
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2013-04-04

10.  The New Normal? Patient Satisfaction and Usability of Telemedicine in Breast Cancer Care.

Authors:  Bryan A Johnson; Bruce R Lindgren; Anne H Blaes; Helen M Parsons; Christopher J LaRocca; Ronda Farah; Jane Yuet Ching Hui
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.