Literature DB >> 11026706

Perforated peptic ulcer: is there a difference between Eastern Europe and Germany? Copernicus Study Group and Acute Abdominal Pain Study Group.

T Sillakivi1, Q Yang, A Peetsalu, C Ohmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ulcer surgery and the epidemiology of peptic ulcer perforation have changed considerably in recent decades. PATIENTS/
METHODS: Within two prospective studies, 170 perforated peptic ulcer patients from 12 Eastern European centres and 37 patients from 11 German centres were analysed.
RESULTS: The median age of patients was 43 years in the Copernicus study and 49 years in the MEDWIS study (P=n.s.), being higher for MEDWIS female patients (73 vs 53 years, respectively; P<0.05). Female patients made up 17% (29/170) of the Copernicus study and 35% (40/170) of the MEDWIS study (P<0.05). Twenty-three per cent (40/170) of patients in the Copernicus study and 54% (20/37) in the MEDWIS study had gastric ulcer perforation (P<0.001). The proportion of definitive operations was higher in Eastern Europe (41.1%; 67/163) than it was in Germany (16.1%; 5/31) (P<0.01). German patients experienced more general complications than Eastern European patients (35 vs 12%, respectively; P<0.01) and a higher mortality [13% (5/37) vs 2% (4/170), respectively; P<0.01]. Delayed admission > or =12 h and age > or =60 years remained predictors for complications in multivariate logistic regression analysis.
CONCLUSION: The proportion of both women and gastric ulcers was higher among German patients, while Eastern European patients underwent more definitive operations. German patients experienced more general complications and a higher mortality. Complications were related to high age and delayed admission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11026706     DOI: 10.1007/s004230000158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Ulcer surgery - what remains?].

Authors:  A H Hölscher; E Bollschweiler; S P Mönig
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  A prospective cohort study of postoperative complications in the management of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Smita S Sharma; Manju R Mamtani; Mamta S Sharma; Hemant Kulkarni
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease in a Tertiary Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Five Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Henok Teshome; Mekbib Birega; Mekdim Taddese
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2020-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.