Literature DB >> 16767475

[Ulcer surgery - what remains?].

A H Hölscher1, E Bollschweiler, S P Mönig.   

Abstract

Ulcer surgery today concentrates on the complications of chronic ulcer disease, especially ulcer perforation and endoscopically uncontrollable ulcer bleeding. In this case the laparoscopic or open closure of the gastroduodenal defect or local hemostasis of the bleeding ulcer by laparotomy are the main aims of surgery. Elective operations due to recurrent gastric or duodenal ulcers have become rare. An indication for gastric ulcer resistant to conservative therapy could be persisting suspicion of malignancy whereas in duodenal ulcer gastric outlet obstruction represents a reason for surgery. If these indications are confirmed the classic procedures of gastric resection like Billroth I and Billroth II are performed whereas vagotomy is no longer used. Altogether ulcer surgery has become very safe although it is practiced quite rarely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16767475     DOI: 10.1007/s00108-006-1625-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Internist (Berl)        ISSN: 0020-9554            Impact factor:   0.743


  53 in total

1.  Nonoperative treatment of perforated peptic ulcer; a further report.

Authors:  S F SEELEY; D CAMPBELL
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1956-05

2.  Comparative analysis of vagotomy and drainage versus vagotomy and resection procedures for bleeding peptic ulcer disease: results of 907 patients from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Authors:  Sebastian G de la Fuente; Shukri F Khuri; Tracy Schifftner; William G Henderson; Christopher R Mantyh; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Peptic ulcer perforation before and after the introduction of H2-receptor blockers and proton pump inhibitors.

Authors:  M Hermansson; C Staël von Holstein; T Zilling
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  Changing incidence of peptic ulcer in Germany.

Authors:  S P Mönig; F Brands
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  J B Sø; C K Kum; M L Fernandes; P Goh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Randomized study of massive bleeding from peptic ulceration.

Authors:  R C Read; H C Huebl; A P Thal
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Conservative management of bleeding duodenal ulcer without a visible vessel: prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  E Saperas; J M Piqué; R Pérez Ayuso; J M Bordas; J Terés; C Pera
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  [Peptic ulcer with a visible non-bleeding vascular wall--early elective surgery or endoscopic therapy?].

Authors:  P Sandbichler; H Pernthaler; D Ofner; A Königsrainer; G Schwab; F Aigner
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1989-11-10       Impact factor: 1.704

9.  Simple closure of perforated duodenal ulcer: a prospective evaluation of a conservative management policy.

Authors:  P C Bornman; N A Theodorou; P C Jeffery; I N Marks; H P Essel; J P Wright; J Terblanche
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Consensus recommendations for managing patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Alan Barkun; Marc Bardou; John K Marshall
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.