Literature DB >> 11025281

Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention.

.   

Abstract

In the classic Stroop effect, naming the color of an incompatible color word (e.g. the word RED printed in green ink; say, 'green') is much slower and more error-prone than is naming the color of a control item (e.g. XXX or CAT printed in green; say 'green'). This seemingly simple interference phenomenon has long provided a fertile testing ground for theories of the cognitive and neural components of selective attention. We present a sketch of the behavioral phenomenon, focusing on the idea that the relative automaticity of the two dimensions determines the direction and the degree of interdimensional interference between them. We then present an outline of current parallel processing explanations that instantiate this automaticity account, and we show how existing interference data are captured by such models. We also consider how Stroop facilitation (faster response of 'red' to RED printed in red) can be understood. Along the way, we describe research on two tasks that have emerged from the basic Stroop phenomenon - negative priming and the emotional Stroop task. Finally, we provide a survey of brain imaging research, highlighting the possible roles of the anterior cingulate in maintaining attentional set and in processing conflict or competition situations.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 11025281     DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01530-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  154 in total

Review 1.  The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

2.  The role of the anterior cingulate cortex in the counting Stroop task.

Authors:  Gail Hayward; Guy M Goodwin; Catherine J Harmer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Presenting two color words on a single Stroop trial: evidence for joint influence, not capture.

Authors:  Colin M MacLeod; Douglas A Bors
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-07

4.  Linear increases in BOLD response associated with increasing proportion of incongruent trials across time in a colour Stroop task.

Authors:  Rachel L C Mitchell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Processing speed weakness in children and adolescents with non-hyperactive but inattentive ADHD (ADD).

Authors:  Timothy L Goth-Owens; Cecilia Martinez-Torteya; Michelle M Martel; Joel T Nigg
Journal:  Child Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Stroop matching task: role of feature selection and temporal modulation.

Authors:  Isabel A David; Eliane Volchan; Jaime Vila; Andreas Keil; Letícia de Oliveira; Aydamari J P Faria-Júnior; Pandelis Perakakis; Elisa C Dias; Izabela Mocaiber; Mirtes G Pereira; Walter Machado-Pinheiro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Novel Symbol Learning-Induced Stroop Effect: Evidence for a Strategy-Based, Utility Learning Model.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Huijun Tang; Yuan Deng
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-10

8.  Differential age-related decline in conflict-driven task-set shielding from emotional versus non-emotional distracters.

Authors:  Jim M Monti; Sandra Weintraub; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Depth cues do not underlie attentional modulations of the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Martina Weltle
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

10.  The role of response mechanisms in determining reaction time performance: Piéron's law revisited.

Authors:  Tom Stafford; Kevin N Gurney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.