Literature DB >> 11024257

Using prospective outcomes data to improve morbidity and mortality conferences.

.   

Abstract

Background:Though a traditional part of most training programs, surgical morbidity and mortality (M&M) conferences are not optimal for teaching residents how to understand and improve patient outcomes. They tend to focus on unusual rather than common problems and review complications as singular phenomena, rather than recurrent events related to specific processes of care. For these reasons, we began incorporating data from our general surgery outcomes registry into our M&M conference.Developed for both clinical research and quality improvement purposes, the outcomes registry contains prospective information about all patients undergoing general surgery procedures in the operating room (approximately 2000 per year). All adverse events occurring within 30 days of surgery are categorized, using explicit criteria, by clinical nurse coordinators. Individual complications are then collapsed into four severity grades (from a previously validated grading system), from I (not life-threatening, low complexity therapy; eg, superficial wound infection) to IV (death).Application To M&M Conferences:Before each conference the data manager supplies the responsible senior resident with information about caseloads and adverse events for the preceding month. At the conference, individual cases are presented in the context of the department's broader experience with that procedure (eg, rates of wound complications after bowel surgery over the last 2 years). In reviewing trends in complication rates over time, we also explore potential relationships between practice changes and outcomes. When appropriate, local performance is compared to external "benchmarks" using data from published studies.Incorporating prospective outcome data into the M&M conference is both feasible and practical. In addition to its educational value for both resident and attending physicians, we believe this approach creates many opportunities for improving the quality of our surgical practice.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 11024257     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7944(00)00251-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Surg        ISSN: 0149-7944


  6 in total

1.  [Complications, misjudgments and errors].

Authors:  C Waydhas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Modification of the surgical morbidity and mortality meetings as a tool to improve patient safety.

Authors:  Ibrahim Abdulrasheed; Delia Ibrahim Zira; Asuku Malachy Eneye
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2011-07

3.  Continuous monitoring of adverse events: influence on the quality of care and the incidence of errors in general surgery.

Authors:  Pere Rebasa; Laura Mora; Alexis Luna; Sandra Montmany; Helena Vallverdú; Salvador Navarro
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Are morbidity and mortality conferences DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) or can they be revived?

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-09-28

5.  Barriers and facilitators to learn and improve through morbidity and mortality conferences: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Marit S de Vos; Jaap F Hamming; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  At the Crossroad with Morbidity and Mortality Conferences: Lessons Learned through a Narrative Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xin Xiong; Teela Johnson; Dev Jayaraman; Emily G McDonald; Myriam Martel; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-04-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.