Literature DB >> 11022881

Continuous assessment of back stress (CABS): a new method to quantify low-back stress in jobs with variable biomechanical demands.

G A Mirka1, D P Kelaher, D T Nay, B M Lawrence.   

Abstract

Jobs with a high degree of variability in manual materials handling requirements expose limitations in current low-back injury risk assessment tools and emphasize the need for a probabilistic representation of the biomechanical stress in order to quantify both acute and cumulative trauma risk. We developed a hybrid assessment methodology that employs established assessment tools and then represents their evaluations in a way that emphasizes the distributions of biomechanical stress. Construction work activities in the home building industry were evaluated because of the high degree of variability in the manual material handling requirements. Each task was evaluated using the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation, The University of Michigan Three-Dimensional Static Strength Prediction Program, and the Ohio State University Lumbar Motion Monitor Model. The output from each model was presented as time-weighted histograms of low-back stress, and the assessments were compared. The results showed considerable differences in what were considered high-risk activities, indicating that these 3 assessment tools consider the risk of low-back injury from different perspectives. The time-weighted distribution aspect of this methodology also contributed vital information toward the identification of high-risk activities. These results illustrate the necessity for more advanced low-back injury risk assessment techniques for jobs with highly variable manual materials handling requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11022881     DOI: 10.1518/001872000779656525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  6 in total

1.  Ergonomic risk factors for low back pain in North Carolina crab pot and gill net commercial fishermen.

Authors:  Kristen L Kucera; Dana Loomis; Hester J Lipscomb; Stephen W Marshall; Gary A Mirka; Julie L Daniels
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Quantifying relationships between selected work-related risk factors and back pain: a systematic review of objective biomechanical measures and cost-related health outcomes.

Authors:  Nancy A Nelson; Richard E Hughes
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.656

Review 3.  Evaluation of the Impact of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Lifting Equation.

Authors:  Ming-Lun Lu; Vern Putz-Anderson; Arun Garg; Kermit G Davis
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Equivalent Weight: Connecting Exoskeleton Effectiveness with Ergonomic Risk during Manual Material Handling.

Authors:  Christian Di Natali; Giorgia Chini; Stefano Toxiri; Luigi Monica; Sara Anastasi; Francesco Draicchio; Darwin G Caldwell; Jesús Ortiz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Study protocol title: a prospective cohort study of low back pain.

Authors:  Arun Garg; Kurt T Hegmann; J Steven Moore; Jay Kapellusch; Matthew S Thiese; Sruthi Boda; Parag Bhoyr; Donald Bloswick; Andrew Merryweather; Richard Sesek; Gwen Deckow-Schaefer; James Foster; Eric Wood; Xiaoming Sheng; Richard Holubkov
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Variable Lifting Index (VLI): A New Method for Evaluating Variable Lifting Tasks.

Authors:  Thomas Waters; Enrico Occhipinti; Daniela Colombini; Enrique Alvarez-Casado; Robert Fox
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.888

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.