Literature DB >> 11021678

Mobility problems and perceptions of disability by self-respondents and proxy respondents.

L I Iezzoni1, E P McCarthy, R B Davis, H Siebens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Americans With Disabilities Act defines disability on the basis of physical or mental impairments or external perceptions of impairment.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine perceptions of disability among people with lower-extremity mobility difficulties. RESEARCH
DESIGN: This study used a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey, the 1994 to 1995 National Health Interview Survey-Disability (NHIS-D) supplement. Using SAS-callable SUDAAN for all analyses, we produced national population estimates.
SUBJECTS: This study included 142,572 noninstitutionalized, civilian residents of the United States who were > or =18 years of age, with 80,423 self-respondents and 49,883 proxy respondents. MEASURES: We created a 4-level mobility variable using NHIS-D questions about the ability to walk, climb stairs, stand and the use of mobility aids. We examined associations between mobility and answers to 2 questions about self- and external perceptions of disability.
RESULTS: The results showed that 3.1% (estimated 5.82 million persons) reported major mobility difficulties, including 3.7% of self-respondents and 2.7% of those with proxy respondents. Among persons with major mobility problems, 70.8% perceived themselves as disabled, whereas 64.8% thought other people see them as disabled. Also, 80.5% of manual wheelchair users saw themselves as disabled. Proxies were somewhat more likely to perceive disability than self-respondents, although differences were not generally statistically significant. In multivariable regressions, mobility level was the strongest predictor of self-perceived disability, followed by general health status.
CONCLUSIONS: Mobility problems increase the likelihood that people will see themselves as disabled, but these perceptions are not universal. Although the schematic of wheelchair users has become an international symbol of disability, many people with serious mobility problems do not view themselves as disabled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11021678     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200010000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  12 in total

1.  Perspectives on the recent decline in disability at older ages.

Authors:  Douglas A Wolf; Kelly Hunt; James Knickman
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  When do older adults become "disabled"? Social and health antecedents of perceived disability in a panel study of the oldest old.

Authors:  Jessica A Kelley-Moore; John G Schumacher; Eva Kahana; Boaz Kahana
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2006-06

3.  Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke in nonagenarians compared with younger patients in a multicenter cohort.

Authors:  Muhib A Khan; Grayson L Baird; David Miller; Anand Patel; Shawn Tsekhan; Shadi Yaghi; Ajit Puri; Mahesh Jayaraman; Nils Henninger; Brian Silver
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 5.836

4.  Health care experiences and perceptions among people with and without disabilities.

Authors:  Heather F de Vries McClintock; Frances K Barg; Sam P Katz; Margaret G Stineman; Alice Krueger; Patrice M Colletti; Tom Boellstorff; Hillary R Bogner
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 2.554

5.  Using video animation to assess mobility in older adults.

Authors:  Anthony P Marsh; Edward H Ip; Ryan T Barnard; Yue-Ling Wong; W Jack Rejeski
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 6.053

6.  Mobility difficulties are not only a problem of old age.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni; E P McCarthy; R B Davis; H Siebens
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Estimating transition probabilities in mobility and total costs for medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Jeanne M Hoffman; Marcia A Ciol; Minh Huynh; Leighton Chan
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Physical and sensory functioning over time and satisfaction with care: the implications of getting better or getting worse.

Authors:  Lisa I Iezzoni; Roger B Davis; Jane Soukup; Bonnie O'Day
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Using administrative data to study persons with disabilities.

Authors:  Lisa I Iezzoni
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.911

10.  The 1994-1995 National Health Interview Survey on Disability (NHIS-D): A Bibliography of 20 Years of Research.

Authors:  Brian W Ward; Heather Ridolfo; Lauren Creamer; Caroline Gray
Journal:  Rev Disabil Stud       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.