Heather F de Vries McClintock1, Frances K Barg2, Sam P Katz2, Margaret G Stineman3, Alice Krueger4, Patrice M Colletti4, Tom Boellstorff5, Hillary R Bogner6. 1. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: heather.devries@uphs.upenn.edu. 2. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Mixed Methods Research Lab, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3. Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Virtual Ability(®), Inc., Aurora, CO, USA. 5. Department of Anthropology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. 6. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about health care experiences among people with and without disabilities. OBJECTIVE: We sought to explore perceptions of people with and without disabilities related to their health care experiences. METHODS: Nineteen persons with and without disabilities participated in one of four focus groups. Focus groups were conducted in the physical world in Milwaukee, WI and in the virtual world in Second Life(®) with Virtual Ability, a well-established community designed by and for people with a wide range of disabilities. A grounded theory methodology was employed to analyze focus group data. Inclusion of physical and virtual world focus groups enabled people with a wide range of disabilities to participate. RESULTS: While some participants described instances of receiving good care, many discussed numerous barriers. The main themes that emerged in focus groups among both persons with and without disabilities related to their health care experiences including poor coordination among providers; difficulties with insurance, finances, transportation and facilities; short duration of visits with physicians; inadequate information provision; feelings of being diminished and deflated; and self-advocacy as a tool. Transportation was a major concern for persons with disabilities influencing mobility. Persons with disabilities described particularly poignant experiences wherein they felt invisible or were viewed as incompetent. CONCLUSIONS: Both persons with and without disabilities experienced challenges in obtaining high quality health care. However, persons with disabilities experienced specific challenges often related to their type of disability. Participants stressed the need for improving health care coordination and the importance of self-advocacy.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about health care experiences among people with and without disabilities. OBJECTIVE: We sought to explore perceptions of people with and without disabilities related to their health care experiences. METHODS: Nineteen persons with and without disabilities participated in one of four focus groups. Focus groups were conducted in the physical world in Milwaukee, WI and in the virtual world in Second Life(®) with Virtual Ability, a well-established community designed by and for people with a wide range of disabilities. A grounded theory methodology was employed to analyze focus group data. Inclusion of physical and virtual world focus groups enabled people with a wide range of disabilities to participate. RESULTS: While some participants described instances of receiving good care, many discussed numerous barriers. The main themes that emerged in focus groups among both persons with and without disabilities related to their health care experiences including poor coordination among providers; difficulties with insurance, finances, transportation and facilities; short duration of visits with physicians; inadequate information provision; feelings of being diminished and deflated; and self-advocacy as a tool. Transportation was a major concern for persons with disabilities influencing mobility. Persons with disabilities described particularly poignant experiences wherein they felt invisible or were viewed as incompetent. CONCLUSIONS: Both persons with and without disabilities experienced challenges in obtaining high quality health care. However, persons with disabilities experienced specific challenges often related to their type of disability. Participants stressed the need for improving health care coordination and the importance of self-advocacy.
Authors: Lisa I Iezzoni; Sowmya R Rao; Julie Ressalam; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Nicole D Agaronnik; Tara Lagu; Elizabeth Pendo; Eric G Campbell Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2022-01 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Heather F McClintock; Jibby E Kurichi; Pui L Kwong; Dawei Xie; Joel E Streim; Liliana E Pezzin; Sean Hennessey; Ling Na; Hillary R Bogner Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Heather F McClintock; Jibby E Kurichi; Pui L Kwong; Dawei Xie; Margaret G Stineman; Hillary R Bogner Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Richard W Sapp; Stefanie S Sebok-Syer; Michael A Gisondi; Jason M Rotoli; Anika Backster; Cori McClure Poffenberger Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2020-09-02
Authors: Lisa I Iezzoni; Sowmya R Rao; Julie Ressalam; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Nicole D Agaronnik; Karen Donelan; Tara Lagu; Eric G Campbell Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Lisa I Iezzoni; Sowmya R Rao; Julie Ressalam; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Karen Donelan; Nicole Agaronnik; Tara Lagu; Eric G Campbell Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2021-06-23