Literature DB >> 11020503

A follow-up study with oocyte donors exploring their experiences, knowledge, and attitudes about the use of their oocytes and the outcome of the donation.

A L Kalfoglou1, G Geller.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVE To learn what information oocyte donors were given and wanted to have about the use of their oocytes and the outcome of the donation.
DESIGN: In-depth interviews.
SETTING: Participants recruited through IVF clinics, matching agency, the Internet, word of mouth, and newspaper ads. PARTICIPANT(S): Thirty-three former oocyte donors and six women preparing to donate. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): None. RESULT(S): Thirty-three former donors completed 66 donation cycles; 48 donation cycles were anonymous. Only 41% (16 of 39) of all participants were comfortable giving the recipient couple complete dispositional authority over the resulting embryos; the remainder wanted some control. One quarter did not want embryos used for research. Fifty-four percent (21 of 39) thought donation of excess embryos to another couple was acceptable, but one third wanted to be informed. Of the 25 anonymous donors, 6 learned the outcome of the donation; 14 others wanted to know. All hoped the donation was successful. CONCLUSION(S): Because oocyte donors' need for information varies, clinics should consider being more flexible in their disclosure policies. Disclosure about the possible uses of donor oocytes or embryos should be mandatory. Findings have implications for the informed consent and counseling processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11020503     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01489-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  7 in total

Review 1.  Ethical issues in stem cell research.

Authors:  Bernard Lo; Lindsay Parham
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 2.  Participation in investigational fertility preservation research: a feminist research ethics approach.

Authors:  Michelle L McGowan
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2010

3.  Informing egg donors of the potential for embryonic research: a survey of consent forms from U.S. in vitro fertilization clinics.

Authors:  Gerald Owen Schaefer; Ninet Sinaii; Christine Grady
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Research ethics. NIH guidelines for stem cell research and gamete donors.

Authors:  Bernard Lo; Lindsay Parham; Marcelle Cedars; Susan Fisher; Elena Gates; Linda Giudice; Dina Gould Halme; William Hershon; Arnold Kriegstein; Radhika Rao; Clifford Roberts; Richard Wagner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Attitude of Law and Medical Students to Oocyte Donation.

Authors:  Samira Vesali Vesali; Elaheh Karimi; Maryam Mohammadi; Reza Omani-Samani
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-03-18

6.  Emotions towards potential genetic offspring among oocyte donors: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sahar Khosravi; Ashraf Kazemi; Seyyed Mehdi Ahmadi
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Gamete donors' satisfaction; gender differences and similarities among oocyte and sperm donors in a national sample.

Authors:  Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Claudia Lampic; Ann-Louise Gejerwall; Johannes Gudmundsson; Per-Olof Karlström; Nils-Gunnar Solensten; Gunilla Sydsjö
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.636

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.