Literature DB >> 11020188

New approach for cochlear implantation: cochleostomy through the middle fossa.

V Colletti1, F G Fiorino, M Carner, L Sacchetto, N Giarbini.   

Abstract

The middle fossa approach was used in 11 patients with profound bilateral hearing loss for insertion of a cochlear implant. Fibroadhesive otitis media (n = 1), bilateral cavity radical mastoidectomy (n = 1), autoimmune inner ear disease (n = 2), previous cranial trauma (n = 1), genetic prelingual deafness (n = 5), and otosclerosis (n = 1) were the causes of deafness. A cochleostomy was performed on the most superficial part of the basal turn, and the electrode array was inserted up to the cochlear apex. Speech perception tests (1-9 months after cochlear implant activation) yielded better results in these patients compared with a homogeneous group of postlingually deaf patients operated on through the traditional transmastoid route. Insertion of the implant through the middle fossa cochleostomy furnishes the possibility of stimulating areas of the cochlea (ie, the middle and apical turns) where a greater survival rate of spiral ganglion cells is known to occur, with improvement of information regarding the formants relevant for speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11020188     DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2000.107406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Current developments in cochlear implantation].

Authors:  R Laszig; A Aschendorff; J Schipper; T Klenzner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Navigation-controlled cochleostomy. Is an improvement in the quality of results for cochlear implant surgery possible?].

Authors:  J Schipper; T Klenzner; A Aschendorff; I Arapakis; G J Ridder; R Laszig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Cochlear implantation in patients with acute or chronic middle ear infectious disease: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Catharine A Hellingman; Erwin A Dunnebier
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Long-term results of the transattical approach: an alternative technique for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Miguel Vaca; Auxiliadora Gutiérrez; Rubén Polo; Antonio Alonso; Felipe Álvarez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Comparison of two cochlear implantation techniques and their effects on the preservation of residual hearing. Is the surgical approach of any importance?

Authors:  J T F Postelmans; R J Stokroos; E van Spronsen; W Grolman; R A Tange; M J Maré; Wouter Albert Dreschler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Cochlear Implantation through the Middle Fossa Approach: A Review of Related Temporal Bone Studies and Reported Cases.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Cisneros Lesser; Rubens Vuono de Brito Neto; Graziela de Souza Queiroz Martins; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-08

7.  Blind Sac Approach Using Silastic Block for Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Ah-Ra Lyu; Yong-Ho Park
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2017-09-19

8.  The use of a simultaneous fascia lata-free flap with cochlear implantation after radical Mastoidectomy.

Authors:  Jason G May; John Kerr; Jack A May; Patrick Tassone; Arnaldo L Rivera
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-08-03

9.  Cochlear implantation through the middle cranial fossa: a novel approach to access the basal turn of the cochlea.

Authors:  Aline Gomes Bittencourt; Robinson Koji Tsuji; João Paulo Ratto Tempestini; Alfredo Luiz Jacomo; Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Rubens de Brito
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.