Literature DB >> 11019963

A comparison of INRs determined with a whole blood prothrombin time device and two international reference preparations for thromboplastin.

A M van den Besselaar1, A M van den Besselar.   

Abstract

Oral anticoagulant therapy is usually monitored with the prothrombin time (PT) on citrate plasma samples. In recent years instruments have been developed for measurement of the PT in non-citrated whole blood. In the present study, the manufacturer's calibration of one type of device (CoaguChek) in terms of the international normalized ratio (INR) was evaluated by one laboratory. Three subsequent lots of test strips for the CoaguChek were investigated using blood samples from 56 coumarin-treated patients. Citrated plasma samples from the same patients were analysed with two international reference preparations for thromboplastin (IRP), i.e., rTF/95 (recombinant human) and RBT/90 (rabbit brain). There were statistically significant INR differences between CoaguChek and the international reference preparations (p <0.001), but the mean relative deviation of the INR was not greater than 0.104. Clinically relevant criteria were used to assess the agreement between the CoaguChek and the IRP results. Standard agreement ranged from 82% to 95%. It is concluded that these test strips achieved a clinically acceptable level of accuracy. Further studies of patient management with these strips are justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11019963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  6 in total

Review 1.  Oral anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Walter Ageno; Alexander S Gallus; Ann Wittkowsky; Mark Crowther; Elaine M Hylek; Gualtiero Palareti
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Accuracy, precision, and quality control for point-of-care testing of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  A M van den Besselaar
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Reliability of international normalised ratios from two point of care test systems: comparison with conventional methods.

Authors:  Leon Poller; Michelle Keown; Nikhil Chauhan; Anton M H P van den Besselaar; Armando Tripodi; Caroline Shiach; Jorgen Jespersen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-05

4.  A randomized trial comparing INR monitoring devices in patients with anticoagulation self-management: evaluation of a novel error-grid approach.

Authors:  Lars G Hemkens; Kristian M Hilden; Stephan Hartschen; Thomas Kaiser; Ulrike Didjurgeit; Roland Hansen; Ralf Bender; Peter T Sawicki
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Comparison of laboratory and immediate diagnosis of coagulation for patients under oral anticoagulation therapy before dental surgery.

Authors:  Birgit Kruse-Loesler; Matthias Kelker; Johannes Kleinheinz
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Comparison of prothrombin time derived from CoaguChek XS and laboratory test according to fibrinogen level.

Authors:  Sue Jung Kim; Eun Young Lee; Rojin Park; Juwon Kim; Jaewoo Song
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.