Literature DB >> 11019349

A qualitative study of participants' experiences with dietary assessment.

N Vuckovic1, C Ritenbaugh, D L Taren, M Tobar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This article reports on the use of focus groups and an experimental participatory activity to investigate factors influencing participants' decisions about what to eat and what to report on food records and food frequency questionnaires.
DESIGN: Four focus groups examined participants' experience with diet records and 3 focus groups explored the topic of food portions using a group consensus activity. Twenty-two women participated in the diet record focus groups, and 15 participated in portion estimation groups.
SUBJECTS: Focus group participants were equally distributed by age and body mass index values. Each woman completed a 10-day doubly labeled water protocol to measure total energy expenditure, 7 days of diet records (before and during total energy expenditure), and a food frequency questionnaire after the total energy expenditure. ANALYSIS: Transcripts of the focus groups were coded to index categories of responses and to identify themes within and across those responses. Themes discussed in this article are those that were discussed most often and at greatest length by all groups.
RESULTS: The diet record focus groups revealed that 2 major factors influenced reporting on diet records: honesty vs social acceptability, and simplifying food intake. The portion estimation focus groups revealed 5 factors that influenced perceptions of portion size: the role of food in the meal, the type of food, personal preferences, product serving sizes, and comparison of personal servings with those of others. APPLICATIONS: The validity and reliability of self-reported food consumption is greatly influenced by the ways people interpret and respond to dietary assessment instruments. These findings indicate that dietetics professionals need to take extra steps to address issues of accurately recording "bad" foods when training patients to complete diet records. Extra probing is needed when dietary records do not include snacks and include simple meals and a large amount of prepared and packaged food because this may indicate that changes in normal dietary patterns were made in order to more easily complete a dietary record.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11019349     DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00301-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  23 in total

1.  Reactivity and its association with body mass index across days on food checklists.

Authors:  Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Douglas Midthune; Kevin W Dodd; Nancy Potischman; Amy F Subar; Frances E Thompson
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.910

2.  Factors influencing behavioral intention regarding prostate cancer screening among older African-American men.

Authors:  Marvella E Ford; Sally W Vernon; Suzanne L Havstad; Shirley A Thomas; Shawna D Davis
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Comparison of two dietary assessment methods by food consumption: results of the German National Nutrition Survey II.

Authors:  Marianne Eisinger-Watzl; Andrea Straßburg; Josa Ramünke; Carolin Krems; Thorsten Heuer; Ingrid Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 5.614

4.  Energy and Nutrient Content of Food Served and Consumed by Nursing Home Residents.

Authors:  F Buckinx; S Allepaerts; N Paquot; J Y Reginster; C de Cock; J Petermans; O Bruyère
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.075

5.  Are diet diaries of value in recording dietary intake of sugars? A retrospective analysis of completion rates and information quality.

Authors:  A Arheiam; S Albadri; S Brown; G Burnside; S Higham; R Harris
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  The National Cancer Institute's Dietary Assessment Primer: A Resource for Diet Research.

Authors:  Frances E Thompson; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Amy F Subar; Jill Reedy; TusaRebecca E Schap; Magdalena M Wilson; Susan M Krebs-Smith
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.910

Review 7.  The nutrition consult for recurrent stone formers.

Authors:  Kristina L Penniston
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Use of focus groups to understand African-Americans' dietary practices: Implications for modifying a food frequency questionnaire.

Authors:  Adelia C Bovell-Benjamin; Norma Dawkin; Ralphenia D Pace; James M Shikany
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Factors influencing perceptions of breast cancer genetic counseling among women in an urban health care system.

Authors:  Marvella E Ford; Sharon Hensley Alford; Diandra Britton; Beth McClary; Howard S Gordon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Children's Social Desirability and Dietary Reports.

Authors:  Suzanne Domel Baxter; Albert F Smith; Mark S Litaker; Michelle L Baglio; Caroline H Guinn; Nicole M Shaffer
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.