Literature DB >> 11016832

Retroelements contribute to the excess low-copy-number DNA in pine.

C G Elsik1, C G Williams.   

Abstract

Excess DNA in the single-copy component is rarely recognized as a contributor to the C-value paradox yet the single-copy component of the pine genome is reported to comprise over 3000 Mb of DNA, in large excess over the estimated 100 Mb required for gene expression. Two hypotheses regarding the factors that might contribute to the excess low-copy-number DNA were tested. The first hypothesis proposes that the excess low-copy kinetic component is actually overestimated by reassociation data analysis. To test this, a previously published C0t curve for Pinus strobus was reanalyzed using a new estimate of genome size based on laser flow cytometry. Part of the excess low-copy-number DNA in the pine genome could be attributed to the choice of parameters used in the analysis of the reassociation data. The second hypothesis holds that diverged retrotransposons contribute to the excess low-copy DNA. Sequences randomly sampled from single-copy and low-repetitive kinetic components of the P. taeda genome were characterized. Twelve of 46 fragments cloned from these fractions were found to show sequence similarity to retroelements: hence diverged retroelements contribute to the excess low-repetitive kinetic component in the pine genome. Similarity search was shown to be a conservative method for identifying retroelements, and thus the number of retroelements in the low-copy component was actually underestimated. Most of the retroelements in this fraction were nonfunctional. divergent from known retroelement families and previously reported only for flowering plants. Divergent retrotransposons are thus a major factor contributing to the expansion of the low-repetitive DNA component in higher plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11016832     DOI: 10.1007/s004380000279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Gen Genet        ISSN: 0026-8925


  10 in total

1.  Chromosomal localization of 5S and 18S rDNA in five species of subgenus Strobus and their implications for genome evolution of Pinus.

Authors:  Qing Cai; Daming Zhang; Zhan-Lin Liu; Xiao-Ru Wang
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  A chromosomal region promoting outcrossing in a conifer.

Authors:  C G Williams; Y Zhou; S E Hall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Cross-species transferability and mapping of genomic and cDNA SSRs in pines.

Authors:  D Chagné; P Chaumeil; A Ramboer; C Collada; A Guevara; M T Cervera; G G Vendramin; V Garcia; J-M Frigerio; C Echt; T Richardson; C Plomion
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  The Pinus taeda genome is characterized by diverse and highly diverged repetitive sequences.

Authors:  Allen Kovach; Jill L Wegrzyn; Genis Parra; Carson Holt; George E Bruening; Carol A Loopstra; James Hartigan; Mark Yandell; Charles H Langley; Ian Korf; David B Neale
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Characterization of the genome of bald cypress.

Authors:  Wenxuan Liu; Supaphan Thummasuwan; Sunish K Sehgal; Philippe Chouvarine; Daniel G Peterson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Repetitive DNA in the pea (Pisum sativum L.) genome: comprehensive characterization using 454 sequencing and comparison to soybean and Medicago truncatula.

Authors:  Jirí Macas; Pavel Neumann; Alice Navrátilová
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Analysis of the giant genomes of Fritillaria (Liliaceae) indicates that a lack of DNA removal characterizes extreme expansions in genome size.

Authors:  Laura J Kelly; Simon Renny-Byfield; Jaume Pellicer; Jiří Macas; Petr Novák; Pavel Neumann; Martin A Lysak; Peter D Day; Madeleine Berger; Michael F Fay; Richard A Nichols; Andrew R Leitch; Ilia J Leitch
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Evolution of complex genome architecture in gymnosperms.

Authors:  Tao Wan; Yanbing Gong; Zhiming Liu; YaDong Zhou; Can Dai; Qingfeng Wang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 7.658

9.  Annotated genetic linkage maps of Pinus pinaster Ait. from a Central Spain population using microsatellite and gene based markers.

Authors:  Marina de Miguel; Nuria de Maria; M Angeles Guevara; Luis Diaz; Enrique Sáez-Laguna; David Sánchez-Gómez; Emilie Chancerel; Ismael Aranda; Carmen Collada; Christophe Plomion; José-Antonio Cabezas; María-Teresa Cervera
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Evolution of genome size and complexity in Pinus.

Authors:  Alison M Morse; Daniel G Peterson; M Nurul Islam-Faridi; Katherine E Smith; Zenaida Magbanua; Saul A Garcia; Thomas L Kubisiak; Henry V Amerson; John E Carlson; C Dana Nelson; John M Davis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.