Literature DB >> 11016320

A comparison of robot-assisted versus manually constructed endoscopic coronary anastomosis.

W D Boyd1, N D Desai, B Kiaii, R Rayman, A H Menkis, F N McKenzie, R J Novick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New technology has enabled surgeons to attempt totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Our purpose was to compare three different techniques of totally endoscopic anastomosis using a porcine animal model.
METHODS: Porcine hearts were excised and the right coronary artery was dissected free for use as an arterial graft. The hearts were placed in a human thoracic model and an endoscopic arterial anastomosis between the free right coronary artery and the left anterior descending coronary artery was performed using one of the following: (1) two-dimensional visualization with straight endoscopic instruments (n = 8); (2) three-dimensional head-mounted visualization with curved endoscopic instruments (n = 7); or (3) three-dimensional visualization with robotic telemanipulation (n = 8). Pathologic analysis of suture placement, vessel trauma, and patency was performed. Anastomoses were graded according to quality, ease, and patency using a seven-point Likert scale (1 = excellent, 7 = very poor).
RESULTS: Endoscopic anastomotic ease and quality were significantly improved when three-dimensional visualization and curved endoscopic instruments were employed. Telemanipulation enhanced the process and provided the best operative results with regard to time required to construct the anastomosis, as well as ease and quality.
CONCLUSIONS: Totally endoscopic anastomosis is feasible using currently available technology. Three-dimensional visualization and robotic telemanipulation significantly facilitate anastomosis construction and will likely benefit clinical operative outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11016320     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01738-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  10 in total

1.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.

Authors:  D Nio; W A Bemelman; O R C Busch; B C Vrouenraets; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Manual robot assisted endoscopic suturing: time-action analysis in an experimental model.

Authors:  J P Ruurda; I A M J Broeders; B Pulles; F M Kappelhof; C van der Werken
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic vascular anastomoses: does robotic (Zeus-Aesop) assistance help to overcome the learning curve?

Authors:  D Nio; W A Bemelman; R Balm; D A Legemate
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending anastomosis performed on the beating heart by endoscopic robot assistance using a new distal connector.

Authors:  Inderjit S Gill; Hironori Izutani
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  A consensus document on robotic surgery.

Authors:  D M Herron; M Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Robotics and surgery: A sustainable relationship?

Authors:  Ankur Khajuria
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  Development and evaluation of a training module for the clinical introduction of the da Vinci robotic system in visceral and vascular surgery.

Authors:  A Mehrabi; C L Yetimoglu; A Nickkholgh; A Kashfi; P Kienle; L Konstantinides; M R Ahmadi; H Fonouni; P Schemmer; H Friess; M M Gebhard; M W Büchler; J Schmidt; C N Gutt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Robotic (super) microsurgery: Feasibility of a new master-slave platform in an in vivo animal model and future directions.

Authors:  Tom J M van Mulken; Rutger M Schols; Shan S Qiu; Kaj Brouwers; Lisette T Hoekstra; Darren I Booi; Raimondo Cau; Ferry Schoenmakers; Andrea M J Scharmga; Rene R W J van der Hulst
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning.

Authors:  F J Voskens; E M van der Schans; J P Ruurda; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Robotic surgery versus laparoscopy; a comparison between two robotic systems and laparoscopy.

Authors:  Christopher Nguan; Andrew Girvan; Patrick P Luke
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-01-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.