Literature DB >> 11013275

Pretreatment nomogram for predicting the outcome of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer.

M W Kattan1, M J Zelefsky, P A Kupelian, P T Scardino, Z Fuks, S A Leibel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Several studies have defined risk groups for predicting the outcome after external-beam radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. However, most models formed patient risk groups, and none of these models considers radiation dose as a predictor variable. The purpose of this study was to develop a nomogram to improve the accuracy of predicting outcome after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective, nonrandomized analysis of patients treated at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1988 and 1998. Clinical parameters of the 1,042 patients included stage, biopsy Gleason score, pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, whether neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy was administered, and the radiation dose delivered. Biochemical (PSA) treatment failure was scored when three consecutive rises of serum PSA occurred. A nomogram, which predicts the probability of remaining free from biochemical recurrence for 5 years, was validated internally on this data set using a bootstrapping method and externally using a cohort of patients treated at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
RESULTS: When predicting outcomes for patients in the validation data set from the Cleveland Clinic, the nomogram had a Somers' D rank correlation between predicted and observed failure times of 0.52. Predictions from this nomogram were more accurate (P<.0001) than the best of seven published risk stratification systems, which achieved a Somers' D coefficient of 0.47.
CONCLUSION: The development process illustrated here produced a nomogram that seems to predict more accurately than other available systems and may be useful for treatment selection by both physicians and patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11013275     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.19.3352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  47 in total

Review 1.  [Indications for and results of radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  M Graefen; P G Hammerer; A Haese; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  The 'CaP Calculator': an online decision support tool for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew S Katz; Jason A Efstathiou; Anthony V D'Amico; Michael W Kattan; Martin G Sanda; Paul L Nguyen; Matthew R Smith; Peter R Carroll; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  Predictive and prognostic models in radical prostatectomy candidates: a critical analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Lughezzani; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Michael W Kattan; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Three linked nomograms for predicting biochemical failure in prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Jose López-Torrecilla; Anna Boladeras; María Angeles Cabeza; Almudena Zapatero; Josep Jove; Luis M Esteban; Ivan Henriquez; Manuel Casaña; Carmen González-San Segundo; Antonio Gómez-Caamaño; Jose Luis Mengual; Asunción Hervás; Julia Luisa Muñoz; Gerardo Sanz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Nomogram Identifies Age as the Most Important Predictor of Overall Survival in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Cancer After Primary Surgery.

Authors:  Supriya Gupta; Jennifer Waller; Jimmy Brown; Yolanda Elam; James V Rawson; Darko Pucar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-08-16

6.  Nomogram for predicting the benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resected gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Samuel J Wang; Andrew Lemieux; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Celine B Ord; Gary V Walker; C David Fuller; Jong-Sung Kim; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Integration of gene expression profiling and clinical variables to predict prostate carcinoma recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Alex Smith; Michael W Kattan; Jaya Satagopan; Victor E Reuter; Peter T Scardino; William L Gerald
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Rationale for the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study RTOG P-0014.

Authors:  Howard M Sandler; Kenneth J Pienta
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

9.  External validation of the ProCaRS nomograms and comparison of existing risk-stratification tools for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  David Tiberi; George Rodrigues; Tom Pickles; Jim Morris; Juanita Crook; Andre-Guy Martin; Fabio Cury; Charles Catton; Himu Lukka; Andrew Warner; Daniel Taussky
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 10.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.