Literature DB >> 11013041

Percutaneous endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: a feasibility study.

D K Traul1, D G Clair, B Gray, P J O'Hara, K Ouriel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endovascular grafting has markedly reduced the invasiveness of the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. By using a modification of technique for available closure devices, we have been able to achieve percutaneous repair of aneurysms. This study reviewed our initial experience with this technique.
METHODS: Demographics and background data from patients undergoing endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms were reviewed from prospectively collected registry data. Operative notes and angiographic and computed tomography scan data were retrospectively reviewed to assess the success of the percutaneous approach.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients have undergone percutaneous placement of the AneuRx (Medtronic, Sunnyvale, Calif) endovascular graft, with a modification of the technique for the Prostar (Perclose, Redwood City, Calif) device for access site closure. Main graft body introduction with a 22F sheath proved successful in nine of 12 (75%) deployments. Contralateral limb deployment through a 16F sheath was successful in 10 of 14 deployments (71.4%). Reasons for conversion to open groin incisions include inadequate percutaneous hemostasis (six cases), iliofemoral dissection (four cases), device failure (one case), and compromised distal flow (one case). Percutaneous deployment success appears to be improved with larger iliac artery dimensions, decreased calcification, and limited tortuosity, because of the limitation of complications related to delivering a larger diameter sheath. Of the 13 percutaneous endograft insertions that were attempted, six (46.2%) were completely successful.
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous deployment of available devices is technically feasible by using modifications of technique with percutaneous closure devices, despite large introducer sizes. Further experience with this technique offers the potential for identifying patients in whom this will prove successful and for even further reducing hospital stay and recovery times for aneurysm repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11013041     DOI: 10.1067/mva.2000.107987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  10 in total

1.  Current status of percutaneous endografting.

Authors:  Bulent Arslan; Ulku C Turba; Saher Sabri; J Fritz Angle; Alan H Matsumoto
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Ultrasound-guided percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair success is predicted by access vessel diameter.

Authors:  Rodney P Bensley; Rob Hurks; Zhen Huang; Frank Pomposelli; Allen Hamdan; Mark Wyers; Elliot Chaikof; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  A single-centre experience of 200 consecutive unselected patients in percutaneous EVAR.

Authors:  Sergio Petronelli; Maria Teresa Zurlo; Silvia Giambersio; Lucia Danieli; Mariaelena Occhipinti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Totally percutaneous versus surgical cut-down femoral artery access for elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Madelaine Gimzewska; Alexander Ir Jackson; Su Ern Yeoh; Mike Clarke
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-21

5.  Canadian experience with percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair: short-term outcomes.

Authors:  S Marlene Grenon; Joel Gagnon; York N Hsiang; Jerry C Chen
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  Fascia Suture Technique and Suture-mediated Closure Devices: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Georgios Karaolanis; Ioannis D Kostakis; Demetrios Moris; Viktoria-Varvara Palla; Konstantinos G Moulakakis
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2018-01-22

7.  Percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair leads to a reduction in wound complications.

Authors:  C O McDonnell; M V Forlee; J F Dowdall; M-P Colgan; P Madhavan; G D Shanik; D J Moore
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Feasibility and safety of total percutaneous closure of femoral arterial access sites after veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Zhenjie Liu; Pan Han; Minzhi He; Yongshan Xu; Li Yin; Zhijun Xu; Qiqiang Liang; Man Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  The effect of percutaneouS vs. cutdoWn accEss in patients after Endovascular aorTic repair (SWEET): Study protocol for a single-blind, single-center, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yuhang Zhou; Jiarong Wang; Jichun Zhao; Ding Yuan; Chengxin Weng; Tiehao Wang; Bin Huang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-19

10.  Safety and Efficacy of the Prostar XL Vascular Closing Device for Percutaneous Closure of Large Arterial Access Sites.

Authors:  Christoph Thomas; Volker Steger; Stefan Heller; Martin Heuschmid; Dominik Ketelsen; Claus D Claussen; Klaus Brechtel
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2013-01-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.