Literature DB >> 11011899

Relation of useful field of view and other screening tests to on-road driving performance.

R S Myers1, K K Ball, T D Kalina, D L Roth, K T Goode.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the value of a clinical driving assessment battery in predicting performance on an on-road driving test. 43 participants referred to the Bryn Mawr Rehab Adapted Driving Program for evaluation of driving ability underwent an evaluation consisting of a predriver screening and an on road driving test. The predriver screening included a vision screening, a reaction rime task, a split-attention task, the Hooper Visual Organization Test, verbal and symbolic sign recognition, and assessment of Useful Field of View. Logistic regression analyses were applied to identify which predriver screening variables could be used to predict outcome on the on road driving test (pass/fail); UFOV was that best single predictor. The addition of screening tests beyond UFOV alone did not increase predictive validity. These findings suggest that UFOV may serve as an indicator of the need for further driving assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11011899     DOI: 10.2466/pms.2000.91.1.279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  27 in total

Review 1.  Minding the aging brain: technology-enabled cognitive training for healthy elders.

Authors:  Joshua R Steinerman
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 2.  Vision and driving.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley; Gerald McGwin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Effect of action video games on the spatial distribution of visuospatial attention.

Authors:  C Shawn Green; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Effect of age and pop out distracter on attended field of view.

Authors:  Raiju J Babu; Susan J Leat; Elizabeth L Irving
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-03-20

5.  The decline in attentional visual fields over time among older participants in the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Driving Study.

Authors:  Prethy Rao; Beatriz Munoz; Kathleen Turano; Cynthia Munro; Sheila K West
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Cross-modal warnings for orienting attention in older drivers with and without attention impairments.

Authors:  Monica N Lees; Joshua Cosman; John D Lee; Shaun P Vecera; Jeffrey D Dawson; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2011-12-26       Impact factor: 3.661

7.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Hyperfocusing of Spatial Attention in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Johanna Kreither; Javier Lopez-Calderon; Carly J Leonard; Benjamin M Robinson; Abigail Ruffle; Britta Hahn; James M Gold; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Directing driver attention with augmented reality cues.

Authors:  Michelle L Rusch; Mark C Schall; Patrick Gavin; John D Lee; Jeffrey D Dawson; Shaun Vecera; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2013-01

Review 9.  Exercising your brain: a review of human brain plasticity and training-induced learning.

Authors:  C S Green; D Bavelier
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-12

10.  What predicts changes in useful field of view test performance?

Authors:  Melissa Lunsman; Jerri D Edwards; Ross Andel; Brent J Small; Karlene K Ball; Daniel L Roenker
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.