Literature DB >> 11010898

Internal trehalose protects endocytosis from inhibition by ethanol in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

P Lucero1, E Peñalver, E Moreno, R Lagunas.   

Abstract

Endocytosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is inhibited by concentrations of ethanol of 2 to 6% (vol/vol), which are lower than concentrations commonly present in its natural habitats. In spite of this inhibition, endocytosis takes place under enological conditions when high concentrations of ethanol are present. Therefore, it seems that yeast has developed some means to circumvent the inhibition. In this work we have investigated this possibility. We identified two stress conditions under which endocytosis was resistant to inhibition by ethanol: fermentation during nitrogen starvation and growth on nonfermentable substrates. Under these conditions, yeast accumulates stress protectors, primarily trehalose and Hsp104, a protein required for yeast to survive ethanol stress. We found the following. (i) The appearance of ethanol resistance was accompanied by trehalose accumulation. (ii) Mutant cells unable to synthesize trehalose also were unable to develop resistance. (iii) Mutant cells that accumulated trehalose during growth on sugars were resistant to ethanol even under this nonstressing condition. (iv) Mutant cells unable to synthesize Hsp104 were able to develop resistance. We conclude that trehalose is the major factor in the protection of endocytosis from ethanol. Our results suggest another important physiological role for trehalose in yeast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11010898      PMCID: PMC92324          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.10.4456-4461.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  52 in total

Review 1.  Stress tolerance: the key to effective strains of industrial baker's yeast.

Authors:  P V Attfield
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  HSP104 required for induced thermotolerance.

Authors:  Y Sanchez; S L Lindquist
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-06-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Endocytic internalization in yeast and animal cells: similar and different.

Authors:  M I Geli; H Riezman
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 4.  Stationary phase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M Werner-Washburne; E Braun; G C Johnston; R A Singer
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1993-06

5.  Catabolite inactivation of the maltose transporter in nitrogen-starved yeast could be due to the stimulation of general protein turnover.

Authors:  E Peñalver; P Lucero; E Moreno; R Lagunas
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Galactose induces in Saccharomyces cerevisiae sensitivity of the utilization of hexoses to inhibition by D-glucosamine.

Authors:  J Nevado; C F Heredia
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Endocytosis and degradation of the yeast uracil permease under adverse conditions.

Authors:  C Volland; D Urban-Grimal; G Géraud; R Haguenauer-Tsapis
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Expression and function of the trehalase genes NTH1 and YBR0106 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  S Nwaka; M Kopp; H Holzer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-04-28       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Multiple effects of trehalose on protein folding in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  M A Singer; S Lindquist
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Hsp104 is required for tolerance to many forms of stress.

Authors:  Y Sanchez; J Taulien; K A Borkovich; S Lindquist
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  9 in total

1.  Biomass content governs fermentation rate in nitrogen-deficient wine musts.

Authors:  Cristian Varela; Francisco Pizarro; Eduardo Agosin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Genetic dissection of ethanol tolerance in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  X H Hu; M H Wang; T Tan; J R Li; H Yang; L Leach; R M Zhang; Z W Luo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Exploiting natural variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify genes for increased ethanol resistance.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Lewis; Isaac M Elkon; Mick A McGee; Alan J Higbee; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Heterologous expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MPR1 gene confers tolerance to ethanol and L: -azetidine-2-carboxylic acid in Hansenula polymorpha.

Authors:  Olena P Ishchuk; Charles A Abbas; Andriy A Sibirny
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Defects in Protein Folding Machinery Affect Cell Wall Integrity and Reduce Ethanol Tolerance in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Aswathy Narayanan; Dileep Pullepu; Praveen Kumar Reddy; Wasim Uddin; M Anaul Kabir
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  Polymorphisms of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes involved in wine production.

Authors:  Ileana Vigentini; Daniela Fracassetti; Claudia Picozzi; Roberto Foschino
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae pheromone-response is a metabolically active stationary phase for bio-production.

Authors:  Thomas C Williams; Bingyin Peng; Claudia E Vickers; Lars K Nielsen
Journal:  Metab Eng Commun       Date:  2016-05-11

8.  Sorbitol required for cell growth and ethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis under heat, ethanol, and osmotic stresses.

Authors:  Kaewta Sootsuwan; Pornthap Thanonkeo; Nawapote Keeratirakha; Sudarat Thanonkeo; Prasit Jaisil; Mamoru Yamada
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 9.  Yeast Interactions in Inoculated Wine Fermentation.

Authors:  Maurizio Ciani; Angela Capece; Francesca Comitini; Laura Canonico; Gabriella Siesto; Patrizia Romano
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.