Literature DB >> 11010607

Economic evaluation of enoxaparin sodium versus heparin in unstable angina. A French sub-study of the ESSENCE trial.

B Detournay1, X Huet, F Fagnani, G Montalescot.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To perform an evaluation from the societal perspective of the cost of treatment with enoxaparin sodium versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction in France.
DESIGN: Four complementary cost-minimisation analyses based on the results of the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) international trial were conducted. We assessed differences in medical resource consumption and in duration of hospital stay in the whole study population (n = 3171) and for the French patients (n = 133).
RESULTS: Results were consistent for the study group as a whole and for the French subgroup. Among patients treated with enoxaparin sodium, there was a statistically significant reduction in the use of angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (whole group study: p = 0.024 and 0.006, respectively) and a trend towards shorter lengths of hospital stay. The differences in angiography and angioplasty rates led to estimated average net cost savings with enoxaparin sodium of French Francs (FF)1555 per treated patient (whole study population) and FF9993 (French subgroup) [1996 values]. The analyses based on the duration of hospital stay resulted in estimated net cost savings with enoxaparin sodium of between FF1014 per treated patient (whole study population) and FF2804 (French subgroup).
CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed earlier results which show that enoxaparin sodium is cost saving in the treatment of unstable angina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11010607     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200018010-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  12 in total

1.  A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for unstable coronary artery disease. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events Study Group.

Authors:  M Cohen; C Demers; E P Gurfinkel; A G Turpie; G J Fromell; S Goodman; A Langer; R M Califf; K A Fox; J Premmereur; F Bigonzi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-08-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Low-molecular-weight heparin : A review of the results of recent studies of the treatment of venous thromboembolism and unstable angina.

Authors:  J Hirsh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-10-13       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Economic assessment of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) versus unfractionated heparin in acute coronary syndrome patients: results from the ESSENCE randomized trial. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q wave Coronary Events [unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction].

Authors:  D B Mark; P A Cowper; S D Berkowitz; L Davidson-Ray; E R DeLong; A G Turpie; R M Califf; B Weatherley; M Cohen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-05-05       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Antithrombotic agents in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J A Cairns; H D Lewis; T W Meade; G C Sutton; P Théroux
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Utilization of coronary angioplasty and cost of angioplasty disposables in 14 western European countries. European Angioplasty Survey Group.

Authors:  M van den Brand
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin acutely and with placebo for 6 weeks in the management of unstable coronary artery disease. Fragmin in unstable coronary artery disease study (FRIC)

Authors:  W Klein; A Buchwald; S E Hillis; S Monrad; G Sanz; A G Turpie; J van der Meer; E Olaisson; S Undeland; K Ludwig
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Variation among hospitals in coronary-angiography practices and outcomes after myocardial infarction in a large health maintenance organization.

Authors:  J V Selby; B H Fireman; R J Lundstrom; B E Swain; A F Truman; C C Wong; E S Froelicher; H V Barron; M A Hlatky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-12-19       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Diagnosing and managing unstable angina. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.

Authors:  E Braunwald; R H Jones; D B Mark; J Brown; L Brown; M D Cheitlin; C A Concannon; M Cowan; C Edwards; V Fuster
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Risk of myocardial infarction and death during treatment with low dose aspirin and intravenous heparin in men with unstable coronary artery disease. The RISC Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-10-06       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Coronary interventions in Europe 1992. The Working Group on Coronary Circulation of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  C Röthlisberger; B Meier
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Cost effectiveness of anticoagulation in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Jaime Latour-Pérez; Eva de-Miguel-Balsa
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Max Brosa; Carlos Rubio-Terrés; Ibrahim Farr; Vijay Nadipelli; Jenaro Froufe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Enoxaparin: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  David Bergqvist
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Costs and cost effectiveness of low molecular weight heparins and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors: in the management of acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Nick Bosanquet; Bengt Jönsson; Keith A A Fox
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Streptokinase and enoxaparin as an alternative to fibrin-specific lytic-based regimens: an ExTRACT-TIMI 25 analysis.

Authors:  Roberto R Giraldez; Stephen D Wiviott; Jose C Nicolau; Satishkumar Mohanavelu; David A Morrow; Elliott M Antman; Robert P Giugliano
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Poland: modelling study from the hospital perspective.

Authors:  Ewa Orlewska; Andrzej Budaj; Dariusz Tereszkowski-Kaminski
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Cost-utility of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in unstable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  T Nicholson; A McGuire; R Milne
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 8.  Cost effectiveness of treatments for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Fotini Gialama; Evangelia Miloni; Nikos Maniadakis
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.981

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.